The instability of the premise of direct quantitative contaminant reduction by elemental iron (Fe0) materials in Fe0/H2O systems is pointed out. Basic knowledge of aqueous iron corrosion shows that the Fe0 surface is not available for decontamination in nature. A comparison of the reactivity of Fe0 and Zn0 shows that the effectiveness of Fe0 materials for environmental remediation is due to the formation of a non-adhesive, porous oxide scale on Fe0. Contaminants are enmeshed within the scale and possibly reduced by FeII and H/H2. An evaluation of current experimental conditions shows that well-mixed batch systems have disturbed the process of scale formation. Therefore, the majority of published works have operatively created conditions for contaminant reduction that are not likely to occur in nature. Since working under such unrealistic conditions has mediated the above-mentioned premise, interactions in Fe0/H2O systems yielding contaminant removal should be revisited.
Hendy SC, Laycock NJ, Ryan MP, J. Electrochem. Soc., B152, 271, 2005
Scherer MM, Balko BA, Tratnyek PG, The role of oxides in reduction reactions at the metal-water interface. In Kinetics and mechanism of reactions at the mineral/water interface (Eds Sparks D, Grundl T) American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 301-322, 1999
Toney MF, Davenport AJ, Davenport LJ, Ryan MP, Vitus CM, Phys. Rev. Lett., 79, 4282, 1997
Schreier CG, Reinhard M, Chemosphere., 29, 1743, 1994
Blowes DW, Ptacek CJ, Benner SG, Mcrae Che WT, Bennett TA, Puls RW, J. Contam. Hydrol., 45, 123, 2000
Tratnyek PG, Scherer MM, Johnson TH, Matheson LJ, Permeable reactive barriers of iron and other zero-valent metals. In Chemical Degradation Methods for Wastes and Pollutants: Environmental and Industrial Applications (Ed M.A. Tarr), 371-421, Marcel Dekker: New York, 2003
Warner SD, Sorel D, Ten years of permeable reactive barriers: lessons learned and future expectations. In Chlorinated Solvent and DNAPL Remediation: Innovative Strategies for Subsurface Cleanup (Eds S.M. Henry, S.D., Warner), 36-50, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, ACS Symp., Ser. 837, 2003
Wang L, Li P, Wu Z, Yan J, Wang M, Ding Y, Synthesis., 13, 2001, 2003
Franck EU, J. Chem. Thermodynamics., 19, 225, 1987
Agrawal A, Tratnyek PG, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 153, 1996
Scherer MM, Johnson K, Westall JC, Tratnyek PG, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 2804, 2001
Noubactep C, Schoner A, Sauter M, Significance of oxide-film in discussing the mechanism of contaminant removal by elemental iron materials. In “Photo-Electrochemistry & Photo-Biology for the Sustainablity”; Kaneco S, Viswanathan B, Katsumata H (Eds.), Bentham Science Publishers, 1, 89-110, 2011
Cornell RM, Schwertmann U, The Iron Oxides: Structure, Properties, Reactions, Occurrences and Uses, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2003
Schwertmann U, Nature., 212, 645, 1966
You Y, Han J, Chiu PC, Jin Y, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9263, 2005
Gillham RW, Development of the granular iron permeable reactive barrier technology (good science or good fortune). In “Advances in environmental geotechnics: proceedings of the International Symposium on Geoenvironmental Engineering in Hangzhou, China, September 8-10, 2009”; Chen Y, Tang X, Zhan L (Eds); Springer Berlin/London, 5-15, 2010