About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
  Guidelines for Publication
  Ethics
Articles & Issues
  Search
  Issue
  Online First
  KJChE on
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethical Responsibilities of
  Authors in KJChE
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.5, 574-582, 2012
Effects of burner type on a bench-scale entrained flow gasifier and conceptual modeling of the system with Aspen Plus
Lee J, Park S, Seo H, Kim M, Kim S, Chi J, Kim K
The integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) system is well known for its high efficiency compared with that of other coal fueled power generating systems. In this study, gasification using different types of burners with different oxygen supply angles in a bench-scale entrained flow gasifier was investigated. The effects of the oxygen gas supply angle of the coal burner and resulting oxygen supply location in the gasifier on the syngas composition and temperature of the gasifier were experimentally examined. These changes had a significant influence on the syngas composition of the final stream, carbon conversion, and efficiencies. According to the experimental results, the models using the Aspen Plus process simulator were positioned to define the effects of the experimental parameters and to find the optimum operating conditions in the bench gasifier facility.
Keywords: Gasification; Entrained Flow Gasifier; Aspen Plus; Modeling
[References]
  1. Future Development of IGCC, IEA Clean Coal Center, 2008
  2. Wen CY, Chaung TZ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev., 18, 684, 1979
  3. Govind R, Shah J, AIChE J., 30(1), 79, 1984
  4. Higman C, Van der Burgt M, 2nd Ed., Elsevier, 2003
  5. Frey CH, Akunuri N, http://www4.ncsu.edu/~frey/reports/Frey_akunuri_2001.pdf, 2001
  6. Martinez E, Vicente W, Salinas Vazquez M, Information Technology., 6, 141, 2006
  7. Nathen SV, Kirkpatrick RD, Young BR, Energy Fuels, 22(4), 2687, 2008
  8. Chen CX, Horio M, Kojima T, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55(18), 3861, 2000
  9. Brown D, Fuchino T, Marechal F, Elsevier, 1661, 2005
  10. Valero A, Uson S, Energy., 28, 7433, 2003
  11. Petersen I, Werther J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 44, 717, 2005
  12. Robinson PJ, Luyben WL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(20), 7784, 2008
  13. Biagini E, Bardi A, Pannocchia G, Tognotti L, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48(19), 9028, 2009
  14. Perez-Fortes M, Bojarski AD, Velo E, Nougues JM, Puigjaner L, Energy, 34(10), 1721, 2009
  15. Lee JW, Kim MY, Chi JH, Kim SM, Park SI, Trans. of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society., 21, 425, 2010
  16. Park SI, Lee JW, Seo HK, Transactions of the Korean Hydrogen and New Energy Society., 21, 470, 2010
  17. Park SI, Lee JW, Seo HK, Kim GS, Kim KT, Fuel Processing Technology., 7, 1374, 2011
  18. Aspen Technology, Inc. Aspen Plus Model for Entrained Flow Coal Gasifier, V7.2, http://support.aspentech.com.
[Cited By]
  1. Lee H, Lee JH, Korean Chemical Engineering Research, 52(5), 592, 2014
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.