Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.5, 636-643, 2012
Modeling of a paper-making wastewater treatment process using a fuzzy neural network
An intelligent system that includes a predictive model and a control was developed to predict and control the performance of a wastewater treatment plant. The predictive model was based on fuzzy C-means clustering, fuzzy inference and neural networks. Fuzzy C-means clustering was used to identify model’s architecture, extract and optimize fuzzy rule. When predicting, MAPE was 4.7582% and R was 0.8535. The simulative results indicate that the learning ability and generalization of the model was good, and it can achieve a good predication of effluent COD. The control model was based on a fuzzy neural network model, taking into account the difference between the predicted value of COD and the setpoint. When simulating, R was 0.9164, MAPE was 5.273%, and RMSE was 0.0808, which showed that the FNN control model can effectively change the additive dosages. The control of a paper-making wastewater treatment process in the laboratory using the developed predictive control model and MCGS (monitor and control generated system) software shows the dosage was computed accurately to make the effluent COD remained at the setpoint, when the influent COD value or inflow flowrate was changed. The results indicate that reasonable forecasting and control performances were achieved through the developed system; the maximum error was only 3.67%, and the average relative error was 2%.
[References]
  1. Maged MH, Mona GK, Ezzat AH, Environ. Model. Software., 19, 919, 2004
  2. Huang MZ, Ma YW, Wan JQ, Wang Y, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 1642, 2010
  3. Chen HW, Yu RF, Ning SK, Huang HC, Resour. Conserv.Recy., 54, 235, 2010
  4. Chen JC, Chang NB, Shieh WK, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel., 16, 149, 2003
  5. Mjalli SF, Al-Asheh S, Alfadala HE, J. Environ. Manage., 83, 329, 2007
  6. Moral H, Aksoy A, Golcay CF, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32(10), 2471, 2008
  7. Elmolla ES, Chaudhuri M, Eltoukhy MM, J. Hazard. Mater., 179(1-3), 127, 2010
  8. Esra Y, Sukran Y, Procedia Comp. Sc., 3, 659, 2011
  9. Onat M, Dogruel M, Contr. Sys. Technol., 12, 65, 2004
  10. Guergachi AA, Patry GG, IEEE T Sys., Man. CY B., 36, 373, 2006
  11. Turkdogan-Aydinol FI, Yetilmezso K, J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 15, 460
  12. Traore A, Grieu S, Thiery F, Polit M, J. Colprim, Comp. Chem.Eng., 30, 1235, 2006
  13. Wu GD, Lo SL, Eng. Appl. Artif. Int., 21, 1189, 2008
  14. Huang MZ, Wan JQ, Ma YM, Wang Y, Li WJ, Sun XF, Expert Sys. Appl., 36, 10428, 2009
  15. Huang MZ, Ma YM, Wan JQ, Wang Y, Expert Sys. Appl., 36, 5064, 2009
  16. Chaiwat W, Annop N, Pawinee C, J. Environ. Sci., 22, 1883, 2010
  17. Chen JC, Chang NB, Eng. Appl. Artif. Int., 20, 959, 2007
  18. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water Wastewater, 4th Ed., China Environment Protection Bureau/China Environmental Science Press, Beijing, China, 2001
  19. Sugeno M, Kang GT, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 28, 15, 1998
  20. Takagi T, Sugeno M, IEEE T Sys., Man. CY B., 15, 116, 1985
  21. Takagi T, Sugeno M, Proc, the IFAC Symp. On Fuzzy Information, Knowledge Representation and Decision Analysis, July, 55, 1983
  22. Jang SR, IEEE T Sys., Man. CY B., 23, 665, 1993