Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.7, 855-861, 2012
Modeling the oxidative coupling of methane using artificial neural network and optimizing of its operational conditions using genetic algorithm
The effect of some operating conditions such as temperature, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV), CH4/O2 ratio and diluents gas (mol% N2) on ethylene production by oxidative coupling of methane (OCM) in a fixed bed reactor at atmospheric pressure was studied over Mn/Na2WO4/SiO2 catalyst. Based on the properties of neural networks, an artificial neural network was used for model developing from experimental data. To prevent network complexity and effective data input to the network, principal component analysis method was used and the number of output parameters was reduced from 4 to 2. A feed-forward back-propagation network was used for simulating the relations between process operating conditions and those aspects of catalytic performance including conversion of methane, C2 products selectivity, C2 yielding and C2H4/C2H6 ratio. Levenberg-Marquardt method is presented to train the network. For the first output, an optimum network with 4-9-1 topology and for the second output, an optimum network with 4-6-1 topology was prepared. After simulating the process as well as using ANNs, the operating conditions were optimized and a genetic algorithm based on maximum yield of C2 was used. The average error in comparing the experimental and simulated values for methane conversion, C2 products selectivity, yield of C2 and C2H4/C2H6 ratio, was estimated as 2.73%, 10.66%, 5.48% and 10.28%, respectively.
[References]
  1. Lunsford JH, Catal. Today, 63(2-4), 165, 2000
  2. Chua YT, Mohamed AR, Bhatia S, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 343(1-2), 142, 2008
  3. Malekzadeh A, Dalai AK, Khodadadi A, Mortazavi Y, Catal.Commun., 9, 960, 2008
  4. Nouralishahi A, Pahlavanzadeh H, Daryan JT, Fuel Process. Technol., 89(7), 667, 2008
  5. Malekzadeh A, Khodadadi A, Abedini M, Amini M, Bahramian A, Dalali AK, Catal. Commun., 2, 241, 2001
  6. Mahmoodi S, Ehsani MR, Ghoreishi SM, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 16(6), 923, 2010
  7. Himmelblau DM, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(4), 373, 2000
  8. Medina EA, Paredes JIP, Math. Comput. Model., 49, 207, 2009
  9. Michalopoulos J, Papadokonstadakis S, Arampatzis G, Lygeros A, Trans. IChemE., 79, 137, 2001
  10. Blasco JA, Fueyo N, Larroya JC, Dopazo C, Chen YJ, Comput. Chem. Eng., 23(9), 1127, 1999
  11. Priddy KL, Keller PE, Artificial neural networks: An introduction, The Soc. of Photo-Opt. Instrum. Eng. (SPIE) Publication, Washington, 2005
  12. Lahiri SK, Ghanta KC, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q., 15(2), 103, 2009
  13. Barshan E, Ghodsi A, Azimifar Z, Jahromi MZ, Pattern Recognit., 44, 1357, 2011
  14. Jolliffe IT, Principal component analysis, 2nd Ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002
  15. Lhabitant FS, Hedge funds: Quantitative insights, John Wily and Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2004
  16. Deep K, Das KN, Appl. Math. Comput., 203, 86, 2008
  17. McCall J, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 184, 205, 2005
  18. Javadi AA, Farmani R, Tan TP, Adv. Eng. Inf., 19, 255, 2005
  19. Wu CC, Hsu PH, Chen JC, Wang NS, Comput. Oper. Res., 38, 1025, 2011
  20. Corriveau G, Guilbault R, Tahan A, Adv. Eng. Softw., 41, 422, 2010
  21. Huang CJ, Chen YJ, Wu CF, Huang YA, Appl. Soft Comput., 9, 824, 2009
  22. Cheng J, J. Const. Steel Res., 66, 1011, 2010
  23. Jozwiak L, Postula A, J. Syst. Archit., 48, 99, 2002