Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.17, No.3, 318-324, 2000
Activity and Durability of Iron-exchanged Mordenite-type Zeolite Catalyst for the Reduction of NO by NH3
NO removal activity and the durability of iron-exchanged mordenite type zeolite catalyst (FeHM) have been examined in a continuous fixed bed flow reactor. The catalytic activity for NO reduction by NH3 in the presence of oxygen was much higher than that in the absence of oxygen, and it was fully reversible with respect to the presence of oxygen in the feed gas stream. The oxidation ability of SCR catalysts including FeHM was critical for both reactions of NH3 and SO2 oxidation, thus for the NO removal activity and its sulfur tolerance. The maximum conversion of NO for FeHM catalyst with respect to the reaction temperature shifted to the higher temperature due to its mild oxidation ability. The deactivation behaviors such as the changes of the physicochemical properties of the catalyst and the loss of NO removal activity induced by SO2 could not be distinguished, regardless of the metals exchange in zeolite. However, the amount of deactivating agents deposited on the catalyst surface depended on the species of metals exchanged on the mordenite type zeolite, which was mainly attributed to the oxidation ability of metals for SO2 conversion to SO3.
[References]
  1. Amiridis MD, Puglisi F, Dumesic JA, Millman WS, Topsoe NY, J. Catal., 142, 572, 1993
  2. Bauerle GL, Wu SC, Nobe K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 17(2), 123, 1978
  3. Chen JP, Yang RT, J. Catal., 139, 277, 1993
  4. Choi EY, Nam IS, Kim YG, Chung JS, Lee JS, Nomura M, J. Mol. Catal., 69, 247, 1991
  5. Choi EY, Nam IS, Kim YG, J. Catal., 161(2), 597, 1996
  6. Chung CM, Choi M, Choo ST, Nam IS, Kim YG, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 34(6), 790, 1996
  7. Ham SW, "Activity and Durability of Copper Ion-exchanged Mordenite for NO Reduction by NH3," Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Chem. Eng., Pohang Univ. of Sci. & Tech., 1995
  8. Ham SW, Choi H, Nam IS, Kim YG, Catal. Today, 11, 611, 1992
  9. Ham SW, Choi H, Nam IS, Kim YG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34(5), 1616, 1995
  10. Ham SW, Choi H, Nam IS, Kim YG, Catal. Lett., 42(1-2), 35, 1996
  11. Iizuka T, Lunsford JH, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 6106, 1978
  12. Ito E, Hultermans RJ, Lugt PM, Burgers MHW, Rigutto MS, vanBekkum H, vanden Bleek CM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 4(1), 95, 1994
  13. Kiovsky JR, Kotadia PB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 19, 218, 1980
  14. Markvart M, Pour V, J. Catal., 7, 279, 1967
  15. Medros FG, Eldridge JW, Kittrell JR, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 28, 1171, 1989
  16. Nam IS, Eldridge JW, Kittrell JR, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 25, 186, 1986
  17. Nam IS, Eldridge JW, Kittrell JR, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 25, 192, 1986
  18. Nam IS, Hwang WC, Ham SW, Kim YG, Catal. Sci. Technol., 1, 165, 1990
  19. Petunchi JO, Hall WK, J. Catal., 78, 327, 1982
  20. Pins WL, Nuninga ZL, Catal. Today, 16, 187, 1993
  21. Ramis G, Busca G, Bregani F, Forzatti P, Appl. Catal., 64, 243, 1992
  22. Schmidt R, Amiridis MD, Dumesic JA, Zelewski LM, Millman WS, J. Phys. Chem., 96, 8142, 1992
  23. Seiyama T, Arakawa T, Matsuda T, Takita Y, Yamazoe N, J. Catal., 48, 1, 1977
  24. Takagi M, Kawai T, Soma M, Onishi T, Tamaru K, J. Phys. Chem., 80(4), 430, 1976
  25. Williamson WB, Lunsford JH, J. Phys. Chem., 80(24), 2664, 1976
  26. Wong WC, Nobe K, Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 25, 179, 1986