Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.29, No.3, 369-376, 2012
Effect of hydraulic retention time and temperature on submerged membrane bioreactor (SMBR) performance
Water shortages and strict environmental provisions necessitate wastewater renovation using various wastewater treatment methods, among which applications of submerged membrane bioreactors (SMBRs) are rapidly increasing due to their advantages such as high loading capacity and quality of effluent. In this work, the effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT 8, 10 and 12 h) and temperature (25, 30 and 35℃) on membrane fouling and sludge production was investigated in a 5-Liter SMBR equipped with immersed PVDF hollow fiber membrane module. Phenolic synthetic wastewater and acclimatized activated sludge with phenol during a 2-month period were used as toxic and microbial sources, respectively. Results showed that by increasing HRT membrane fouling decreases, while excellent treatment performance of over 99.5% phenol and 95% COD removals was achieved at all HRTs. Therefore, HRT=8h corresponding to the highest effluent flow rate of 12 L/m2·h was used to investigate the effect of temperature, resulting in phenol and COD removals of higher than 99 and 96%, respectively, at all temperatures. Membrane fouling occurred at 12, 5 and 3 days for 25, 30 and 35 ℃, respectively. Additionally, the effect of HRT and temperature on mixed liquor volatile suspended solid (MLVSS) as a measure of biomass was examined. MLVSS concentration showed decreases with increasing HRT and temperature. Overall, it was shown that SMBR can be used to efficiently treat phenolic wastewater at a range of flow rates and temperatures, among which HRT=8 h and T=25 ℃ are the preferred operating conditions, resulting in high flow rate and low membrane fouling.
[References]
  1. Judd S, The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors in Water and Wastewater Treatment, Elsevier, Oxford, 2006
  2. Tragardh G, Johansson D, Desalination, 119(1-3), 21, 1998
  3. Juang YC, Lee DJ, Lai JY, J. Chin. Ins. Chem. Eng., 39, 657, 2008
  4. Delgado S, Diaz F, Villarroel R, Vera L, Diaz R, Elmaleh S, Desalination, 146(1-3), 445, 2002
  5. Shin HS, Kang ST, Water Res., 37, 121, 2003
  6. Zhang F, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1, 2859, 2009
  7. Viero AF, Sant GL, A. Jr, J. Hazard. Mater., 150, 185, 2008
  8. Meng FG, Yang FL, J. Membr. Sci., 305(1-2), 48, 2007
  9. Zhang ST, Yang FL, Liu YH, Zhang XW, Yamada Y, Furukawa K, Desalination, 194(1-3), 146, 2006
  10. Lee W, Kang S, Shin H, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 217, 2003
  11. Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ, J. Membr. Sci., 218(1-2), 117, 2003
  12. Wicaksana F, Fane AG, Chen V, J. Membr. Sci., 271(1-2), 186, 2006
  13. Al-Amri A, Salim MR, Aris A, Desalination, 259(1-3), 111, 2010
  14. Le-Clech P, Jefferson B, Judd SJ, Desalination, 173(2), 113, 2005
  15. Tarleton ES, Wakeman RJ, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 71399, 1993
  16. Defrance L, Jar€in MY, Gupta B, Paullier P, Geaugey V, Bioresur. Technol., 105, 2000
  17. Lee W, Kang S, Shin H, J. Membr. Sci., 216(1-2), 217, 2003
  18. Magara Y, Itoh M, Water Sci. Technol., 23, 1583, 1991
  19. Lee J, Ahn WY, Lee CH, Water Res., 35(10), 2435, 2001
  20. Chae SR, Watanabe Y, J. Water Environ. Technol., 5, 45, 2007
  21. Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S, Randall A, Desalination, 143(3), 219, 2002
  22. Chae SR, Ahn YT, Kang ST, Shin HS, J. Member. Sci., 280, 16, 2006
  23. Huang Z, Ong SL, Ng HY, Water Res., 1, 2010
  24. Hong SP, Bae TH, Tak TM, Hong S, Randall A, Desalination, 143(3), 219, 2002
  25. Tardiff O, Hall ER, Water Sci. Technol., 35, 57, 1997
  26. Huuhilo T, Suvilampi J, Puro L, Rintala J, Manttari M, Nuortila J, Jokinen, Nystrom M, Paper and Timber., 84, 50, 2002
  27. Ahn S, Congeevaram S, Choung YK, Park J, Desalination., 494, 2008
  28. Martinez AB, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 288, 2006
  29. Maghami M, Membrane bioreactor design for synthetic wastewater treatment, Master of Science Thesis in Chemical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, 2010
  30. American Public Health Association and American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Ed., Washington DC, 1998
  31. Greenberg AE, Trussell RR, Clesceri LS, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 16th Ed., 556, 1985
  32. Cheremisinoff NP, The Biochemical Book: Biotechnology for Water and Wastewater Treatment, 2001
  33. Barrios-Martinez A, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 281(1-2), 288, 2006
  34. Meng F, Chae SR, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin HS, Yang F, Water Res., 1489, 2009
  35. Ren N, Chen Z, Wanga A, Hu D, International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation., 55, 279, 2005
  36. Kargi F, Konya I, J. Environ. Manage., 84, 20, 2007
  37. Song KG, Cho J, Ahn KH, Bioprocess Biosystem Eng., 32, 135, 2009
  38. Wang Z, Wu Z, Tang S, Water Res., 43, 2504, 2009
  39. Suvilampi and JAerobic, wastewater treatment under high and varying temperature-thermophilic process performance and effluent quality, Doctoral Thesis, University of Jyvaskyla, 59, 2003
  40. Barrios-Martinez A, Barbot E, Marrot B, Moulin P, Roche N, J. Membr. Sci., 281(1-2), 288, 2006
  41. Joao CT, Rachel PR, Claudio MS, Valter RL, Process Biochem., 40, 1125, 2005
  42. Ahn S, Congeevaram S, Choung YK, Park J, Desalination., 494, 2008