Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.10, 2017-2023, 2011
Simulation study of biobutanol production in a polymer-loaded two-phase partitioning bioreactor (PL-TPPB): Simulation and strategy for biobutanol production
A simulation study was performed for a two-phase partitioning bioreactor (TPPB) with polymer beads, Dowex Optipore L-493, as a second phase. When the initial glucose concentration is less than 30 g/L, a single-phase bioreactor is preferred, because it consumed all the glucose with 40% of biobutanol yield. Any glucose over the concentration remained in the single-phase bioreactor because cells were completely inhibited by products, mainly biobutanol, and thus glucose availability became less than 100%. The TPPB with 10% polymer beads completely consumed up to 120 g/L glucose and more polymer beads were required for the higher glucose concentration. Instead of increasing the proportion of polymer beads, 2 vvm of nitrogen gas was introduced continuously into the TPPB for the stripping of products, reducing product inhibitions. By applying gas stripping to the TPPB containing 10% polymer beads, 150 g/L of glucose was completely consumed and 99.7% acetone, 46.8% butanol and 82.5% ethanol was stripped out of the TPPB. Finally, on the basis of these estimations, a novel strategy based on the initial glucose concentration was suggested for high biobutanol production.
[References]
  1. Sang BI, Kim YH, News Inf. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 704, 2008
  2. Cha WO, News Inf. Chem. Eng., 25(6), 609, 2007
  3. Izak P, Ruth W, Fei Z, Dyson PJ, Kragl U, Chem. Eng. J., 139(2), 318, 2008
  4. Sang BI, Kim YH, News Inf. Chem. Eng., 26(6), 704, 2008
  5. Ezeji TC, Karcher PM, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP, Biopro. Biosyst. Eng., 27, 207, 2005
  6. Qureshi N, Hughes S, Maddox IS, Cotta MA, Biopro. Biosyst. Eng., 27, 215, 2005
  7. Cho MO, Lee SM, Sang BI, Um YS, KSBB J., 24, 446, 2009
  8. Qureshi N, Maddox IS, Friedel A, Biotehcnol. Progr., 8, 382, 1992
  9. Ei-Zanati E, Abdel-Hakim E, El-Ardi O, Fahmy M, J. Membr. Sci., 280(1-2), 278, 2006
  10. Cho MO, Lee SM, Sang BI, Um YS, KSBB J., 24, 446, 2009
  11. Choi JM, Yeom SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., Submitted, 2011
  12. Daugulis AJ, Trends Biotechnol., 19, 459, 2001
  13. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Process Biochem., 36, 765, 2001
  14. Littlejohns JV, McAuley KB, Daugulis AJ, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 872, 2010
  15. Yoon JY, Park CH, Kim WJ, Korean J. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 15(4), 380, 2000
  16. Yang XP, Tsao GT, Biotechnol. Prog., 10(5), 532, 1994
  17. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Lee SH, Process Biochem., 45, 1582, 2010
  18. Yeom SH, Daugulis AJ, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 72(2), 156, 2001
  19. Nielsen DR, Daugulis AJ, McLellan PJ, Biochem. Eng. J., 36, 239, 2007
  20. Littlejohns JV, McAuley KB, Daugulis AJ, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 872, 2010
  21. Qureshi N, Maddox IS, Friedel A, Biotehcnol. Progr., 8, 382, 1992
  22. Qureshi N, Blaschek HP, Renew. Eng., 22, 557, 2001
  23. Ezeji TC, Karcher PM, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP, Biopro. Biosyst. Eng., 27, 207, 2005