Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.7, 1593-1598, 2011
Incorporation of vapor permeation process to esterification reaction of propionic acid and isopropanol for performance improvement
A commercial tubular zeolite membrane (NaA) was employed in a vapor permeation system to dehydrate the reaction mixture during the esterification of propionic acid with isopropanol. The reaction was performed in a batch reactor, using Amberlyst 15 as a catalyst with different weight fractions relative to propionic acid. Experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of the alcohol-to-acid molar ratio on the performance of the hybrid process. The integration of the chemical reaction with the vapor permeation process significantly enhanced the conversion of the reversible esterification reaction. It was observed that contrary to the effect of increasing alcohol-to-acid molar ratio from 1 : 1 to 1.5 : 1, the acid conversion and the permeated water flux decreased when the reactants molar ratio increased from 1.5 : 1 to 3 : 1. This effect was due to the reducing effect of reaction mixture composition on the boiling point and reaction and evaporation rates during the hybrid process. Also, increasing catalyst loading had noticeable influence on the acid conversion and the permeated water flux.
[References]
  1. Lipnizki F, Field RW, Ten PK, J. Membr. Sci., 153(2), 183, 1999
  2. Lim SY, Park B, Hung F, Sahimi M, Tsotsis TT, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(22-23), 4933, 2002
  3. Morigami Y, Kondo M, Abe J, Kita H, Okamoto K, Sep. Purif. Technol., 25(1-3), 251, 2001
  4. Bernal MP, Coronas J, Menendez M, Santamaria J, Int. J. Santamaria (Ed.), Fourth International Conference on Catalysis in Membrane Reactors, ICCMR, Zaragosa, Spain, 71, 2000
  5. Tanaka K, Kita H, Okamoto K, Int. J. Santamaria (Ed.), Fourth International Conference on Catalysis in Membrane Reactors, ICCMR, Zaragosa, Spain, 73, 2000
  6. Tanaka K, Yoshikawa R, Ying C, Kita H, Okamoto K, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(9), 1577, 2002
  7. Tanaka K, Yoshikawa R, Ying C, Kita H, Okamoto K, Catal. Today, 67(1-3), 121, 2001
  8. Inoue T, Nagase T, Hasegawa Y, Kiyozumi Y, Sato K, Kobayashi K, Nishioka M, Hamakawa S, Mizukami F, Chem. Letters., 1, 35, 2006
  9. Sharma ON, Nageshwar GD, Mene PS, Indian J. Technol., 11, 360, 1973
  10. Dakshinamurty P, Ramarao MVS, Ramachandramurty CV, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 34A, 257, 1984
  11. Xu ZP, Chuang KT, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 74(4), 493, 1996
  12. Yadav GD, Thathagar MB, React. Funct. Polym., 52, 99, 2002
  13. Kondo M, Komori M, Kita H, Okamoto K, J. Membr. Sci., 133(1), 133, 1997
  14. Song W, Venimadhavan G, Manning JM, Malone MF, Doherty MF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37(5), 1917, 1998
  15. Yadav GD, Kulkarni HB, React. Funct. Polym., 44(2), 153, 2000
  16. Ali SH, Tarakmah A, Merchant SQ, Al-Sahhaf T, Chem. Eng. Sci., 62(12), 3197, 2007
  17. Delgado P, Sanz MT, Beltran S, Chem. Eng. J., 126(2-3), 111, 2007
  18. Venkateswarlu K, Sinha R, Rao RJ, Chem. Petrochem. J., 3, 1976
  19. Rao YV, Reddy MS, Rao CV, Chem. Petrochem. J., 27, 1976
  20. Sai PST, J. Energy Heat Mass Transfer., 10, 181, 1988
  21. Lee MJ, Wu HT, Kang CH, Lin HM, J. Chin. Inst. Chem. Eng., 30, 117, 1999
  22. Awad MM, Salem AM, Swelam AA, J. Indian Chem. Soc., 74, 497, 1997
  23. Ali SH, Merchant SQ, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 38, 593, 2006