Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.7, 1580-1586, 2011
Application of statistical experimental design for optimization of downstream process for recovery of pullulan produced by Aureobasidium pullulans HP-2001
The optimal conditions of the downstream process for recovery of pullulan produced by Aureobasidium pullulans HP-2001 were examined using response surface method (RSM). The optimal amount of diatomite in filter press and the optimal flow rate in a continuous flow centrifuge for removal of cells from the culture broth of A. pullulans HP-2001 were found to be 5.0% (v/v) and 2.0 L/min. Based on central composite design (CCD) experiments and analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that the optimal conditions for recovery of pullulan from the supernatant by precipitation were the volume ratio of ethanol (or isopropanol) to supernatant of 3.0 : 1.0, the reaction time of 29.5 h, and the reaction temperature of 20.2 ℃. The expected maximal recovery yields of pullulan using ethanol and isopropanol under optimized conditions were 79.2 and 85.5%, respectively.
[References]
  1. Singh PS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF, Carbohydr. Polym., 73, 515, 2008
  2. Shingel KI, Carbohydr. Res., 339, 447, 2004
  3. Leathers TD, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 62(5-6), 468, 2003
  4. Song H, Lee SY, Enzym. Microb. Technol., 39, 352, 2009
  5. Seo HP, Chung CH, Kim SK, Gross RA, Kaplan DL, Lee JW, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 14, 237, 2004
  6. Seo HP, Jo KI, Son CW, Yang JK, Chung CH, Nam SW, Kim SK, Lee JW, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 16, 374, 2006
  7. Wu S, Jin Z, Kim JM, Tong Q, Chen H, Carbohydr. Polym., 77, 750, 2009
  8. Singh RS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF, Carbohydr. Polym., 78, 89, 2009
  9. Singh RS, Singh H, Saini GK, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 152(1), 42, 2009
  10. Cui JD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27(1), 174, 2010
  11. Sen R, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 68(3), 263, 1997
  12. Miller GL, Anal. Chem., 31, 426, 1959
  13. Garcia-Ochoa F, Santos VE, Gasas JA, Gomez E, Biotechnol. Adv., 18, 549, 2000
  14. SlJjivi M, Smiciklas I, Pejanovi S, Plecas I, Appl. Clay Sci., 43, 33, 2009
  15. Osmanlioglu AE, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 65, 17, 2007
  16. Boychyn M, Yim SSS, Shamlou PA, Bulmer M, More J, Hoare A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(16), 4759, 2001
  17. Kachhawa DK, Bhattacharjee P, Singhal RS, Carbohydr. Polym., 52, 25, 2003
  18. Swales C, Wright S, Water Res., 34, 1962, 2000
  19. Higgins JA, Trout J, Fayer MR, Shelton D, Jenkins MC, Water Res., 37, 3551, 2003
  20. Akhnazarova S, Kefarov V, Experiment optimization in chemistry and chemical engineering, Moscow, Mir Publishers, 135, 1982
  21. Khuri AI, Cornell JA, Response surfaces: Design and analysis, New York, Marcel Dekker, 211, 1987
  22. Shinomiya K, Kabasawa Y, Toida T, Omaniari T, Ito Y, J. Chromatogr., 922, 365, 2001
  23. Pollock TJ, Thorne L, Armentrout RW, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 877, 1992
  24. Lazaridou A, Biliaderis CG, Roukas T, Izydorczyk M, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 97(1), 1, 2002
  25. Singh PS, Saini GK, Kennedy JF, Carbohydr. Polym., 78, 89, 2008
  26. Hofmann R, Kappler T, Posten C, Sep. Purif. Technol., 51(3), 303, 2006