Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.13, No.4, 364-368, 1996
BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LOW STRENGTH MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER
Most Korean community represents the primary effluent of 180 mg/L COD, 80 mg/L BOD, 25 mg/L TKN and 4 mg/L TP. A/O, A2/O and MUCT (Modified University of Cape Town) systems were applied to laboratory scale reactor with a temperature of 10 to 20℃. A total of 6 hour hydraulic retention time including anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zones was used with a maximum 3,000 mg/L MLss to simulate the existing municipal plants. All BNR systems represented effluent BOD less than 10 mg/L. MUCT produced better quality; 0.5 mg/L SP (soluble phosphorus) with 10 mg/L TN vs 1.8 mg/L SP with 12 mg/L TN for A2/O with the same internal recycle ratio. Performance of BNR systems would suggest the primary effluent used for this study represents a nature of slowly biodegradable COD. As that result, anaerobic fraction must be increased to attain lower effluent P concentrations. However, prefermentation to increase P removal was not necessary since P was also limited. Microbial mass fractions computed from COD and nitrogen mass balances suggested that poly-P microbes were about 33% in A/O and MUCT, denitrfier fractions were about 30% in A2/O and MUCT. Nitrifier fractions were about 2%.
[References]
  1. Abu-Ghararah ZH, Randall CW, Water Sci. Technol., 23, 585, 1991
  2. Cech JS, Hartman P, Water Res., 27, 1219, 1993
  3. Eckenfelder WW, Argaman Y, "Principal and Practice of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater," Edited by Sedlak, R.I., Soap & Detergent Association, New York, U.S.A., 1991
  4. Ekama GA, Marais GR, Siebritz IP, "Biological Excess Phosphorus Removal, Design and Operation of Nutrient Removal Activated Sludge Process," Wat. Res. Commission, P.O. Box 824, Pretoria 0001, South Africa, 1984
  5. EPA, "Manual Nitrogen Control," EPA/625/R-93/010, U.S. EPA, 1993
  6. Henze M, Grady CPL, Gujer W, Marais GR, Matsuo T, "Activated Sludge Model No. 1, Scientific and Technical Report No. 1," IAWPRC, London, ISSN 1010-707X, 1987
  7. Henze M, Water Sci. Technol., 25, 1, 1992
  8. Pitman AR, Venter SLV, Nicholls HA, "Practical Experience with Biological Phosphorus Removal Plants in Johannesburg," in Phosphate Removal in Biological Treatment Processes, edited by Wiechers, H.N.S., Pergamon Press, pp. 233-259, 1983
  9. Randall CW, "York River Sewage Treatment Plant Biological Nutrient Removal Demonstration Project," Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, U.S.A., 1988
  10. Wallis-Lage CL, Pully T, Johnson TL, "Biological Nutrient Removal Using a Low Strength Waste," WEF 65th Annual Conference & Exposition proceedings, New Orleans, SEp. 20-24, pp. 123-134, 1992
  11. Wentzel MC, Dold PL, Loewenthal RE, Ekama GA, Marais GR, "Experiments Towards Establishing the Kinetics of Biological Excess Phosphorus Removal," in Biological Phosphate Removal Wastewaters, edited by Ramadori, R., Pergamon Press, pp. 79-97, 1987
  12. Wentzel MC, Ekama GA, Marais GR, Water Sci. Technol., 23, 555, 1991