Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.28, No.5, 1227-1232, 2011
Aluminum speciation in drinking water distribution system: A case study in northeastern China
This study aimed to investigate the variation of aluminum species in a drinking water distribution system in a city in northeastern China. The aluminum species were determined by fluorometric methods. Results showed that suspended aluminum (Sus-Al) was the major species in the drinking water supplied by plant B and accounted for about 42% of the total aluminum (Tol-Al). The concentrations of Sus-Al and Tol-Al could be controlled effectively by introducing reservoir water. In the water source switching process, the water quality variation led to the suddenly release of Sus-Al, especially in a cast iron pipeline that had been in service for more than 30 years, but the soluble aluminum varied little. In the plant A service areas, the average concentrations of the inorganic monomeric aluminum (IM-Al), monomeric aluminum (Mon-Al), and soluble aluminum (Sol-Al) were 0.008 mg L.1, 0.03 mg L.1, and 0.04 mg L.1, respectively, and their concentrations in the plant B service areas were higher. The pH and fluoride were the major parameters affecting the soluble aluminum speciation. With a solution pH of 6.5-7.5 and fluoride below 0.3 mg L.1, the Sol-Al could be controlled within 0.1 mg L.1. Water quality regulation and terminal filtration were suggested for residual aluminum control.
[References]
  1. Christopher SC, Carl LS, Science., 204, 304, 1979
  2. Gerhard F, Brian LP, Kai-Uwe U, Rosemarie P, William HC, Science., 297, 2245, 2002
  3. Driscoll CT, Letterman RD, J. Environ. Eng., 114, 21, 1988
  4. Cui FY, Hu MC, Zhang Y, Cui CW, China Water and Wastewater., 18, 4, 2002
  5. Miller RD, Kopfler FC, Kelty KC, Stober JA, Ulmer NS, J. American Water Works Association., 76, 84, 1984
  6. Letterman RD, Driscoll CT, J. American Water Works Association., 80, 154, 1988
  7. Sollars CJ, Bragg AM, Simpson AM, Perry R, Environ. Technol. Lett., 10, 130, 1989
  8. Srinivasan PT, Viraraghavan T, Subramanian KS, Water SA., 25, 47, 1999
  9. Kvech S, Edwards M, J. American Water Works Association., 93, 104, 2001
  10. Fuge R, Pearce NJG, Perkins WT, Environ. Geochem. Health., 14, 15, 1992
  11. Shea RD, Public Works., 124, 54, 1993
  12. Kriewall D, Harding R, Naisch E, Schantz L, Public Works., 127, 28, 1996
  13. Havics AA, Microscope., 49, 1, 2001
  14. Birchall JD, Colloid Chemistry of Silica., 234, 601, 1994
  15. Martin RB, J. Inorg. Biochem., 44, 141, 1991
  16. Van Benschoten JE, Edzwald JK, J. American Water Works Association., 82, 71, 1990
  17. Wang CY, Bi SP, Zhang CH, Zhang ZC, Yang WH, J. Inst. Anal., 23, 1, 2004
  18. Exley C, Birchall JD, Polyhedron., 12, 1007, 1993
  19. U.S. EPA. Office of Groundwater and Drinking Water, Inorganic Contaminant Accumulation in Potable Water Distribution Systems, USEPA:31, 2006
  20. Lian HZ, Kang YF, Yasen A, Bi SP, Li DN, Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis., 24, 1391, 2004
  21. State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Analysis Method of the Water and Wastewater (Revision 4). Environmental Science Press of China: Beijing, 340, 2002
  22. Wang WD, Yang HW, Zhao HZ, Jiang ZP, J. Environ. Sci., 19, 897, 2007
  23. Wang WD, Yang HW, Wang XC, Jiang J, Zhu WP, J. Environ. Sci., 22, 211, 2010