Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.12, No.2, 264-268, 1995
EFFECT OF ACETIC ACID ON POLY-(3-HYDROXYBUTYRATE-CO-3-HYDROXYVALERATE) SYNTHESIS IN RECOMBINANT ESCHERICHIA COLI
The synthesis of poly-(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) [P(3HB-co-3HV)] copolymer by recombinant Escherichia coli was studied in the medium containing glucose and valeric acid as carbon sources. A recombinant E. coli strain (fadR atoC) harboring a stable high-copy number plasmid containing the Alcaligenes eutrophus polyhydroxy alkanoate (PHA) biosynthesis genes was constructed for the production of the copolymer P(3HB-co-3HV). Accumulation of acetic acid not only had a detrimental effect on cell growth but also decreased the flux of acetyl-CoA into the P(3HB-co-3HV) biosynthetic pathway. Reducing specific growth rate by increasing the initial acetic acid concentration resulted in enhanced copolymer synthesis due to less accumulation of acetic acid. Initial acetic acid concentration of 50mM was found to be optimal at 20g/l glucose and 20mM valeric acid concentration. The fraction of 3-hydroxyva-lerate (3HV) increased with decreasing growth temperature. The ratios of 3HV to 3HB in the copolymer could be controlled by altering the concentrations of valeric acid and glucose in the medium. Catabolite repression was in part responsible for the inefficient copolymer synthesis. Various nutritional components were examined for their ability to relieve catabolite repression. An addition of oleic acid resulted in threefold increase of the 3HV fraction in the copolymer. An addition of a small amount of tryptone and peptone considerably promoted P(3HB-co-3HV)synthesis.
[References]
  1. Anderson AJ, Dawes EA, Microbiol. Rev., 54, 450, 1990
  2. Braunegg G, Sonnleitner B, Lafferty RM, Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 6, 29, 1978
  3. Byrom D, Trends Biotechnol., 5, 246, 1987
  4. Doi Y, "Microbial Polyesters," VCH, New York, 1990
  5. Haywood GW, Anderson AJ, Dawes EA, Biotechnol. Lett., 11, 471, 1989
  6. Holmes PA, Phys. Technol., 16, 32, 1985
  7. Lee SY, Chang HN, Chang YK, Annu. NY Acad. Sci., 721, 43, 1994
  8. Lee SY, Yim KS, Chang HN, Chang YK, J. Biotechnol., 32, 203, 1994
  9. Lee SY, Chang HN, Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., in press, 1995
  10. Luli GW, Strohl WR, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 56, 1004, 1990
  11. Maloy SR, Nunn WD, J. Bacteriol., 148, 83, 1981
  12. Maloy SR, Nunn WD, J. Bacteriol., 149, 173, 1982
  13. Meyer HP, Leist C, Fiechter A, J. Biotechnol., 1, 355, 1984
  14. Pan JG, Rhee JS, Labeault JM, Biotechnol. Lett., 9, 89, 1987
  15. Pastan I, Adhya S, Bacteriol. Rev., 40, 527, 1976
  16. Pauli G, Ehring R, Overath P, J. Bacteriol., 117, 1178, 1974
  17. Peoples OP, Sinskey AJ, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 15293, 1989
  18. Peoples OP, Sinskey AJ, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 15298, 1989
  19. Reiling HE, Laurila H, Fiechter A, J. Biotechnol., 2, 191, 1985
  20. Schubert P, Steinbuchel A, Schlegel HG, J. Bacteriol., 170, 79, 1988
  21. Slater S, Gallaher T, Dennis D, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 58, 1089, 1992
  22. Slater SC, Voige WH, Dennis DE, J. Bacteriol., 170, 4431, 1988
  23. Weeks G, Shapiro M, Burns RO, Wakil SJ, J. Bacteriol., 97, 827, 1969
  24. Yim KS, M.S. Thesis, KAIST, Taejon, Korea, 1994