Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.10, No.2, 85-92, 1993
RIGOROUS TREATMENT OF ADSORPTION DATA FOR MULTICOMPONENT PREDICTIONS
Three considerations in the rigorous treatment of adsorption data for multicomponent adsorption equilibria are discussed below : (1) choice of pure-component model for the ideal adsorbed solution theory; (2) variable sensitivity analysis for the choice of independent variable stes; and (3) the error-in-variables method for binary interaction parameters. The O’Brien and Myers model gave better agreement with adsorption data than the Langmuir model for single components. However, in the prediction of binary and ternary component adsorption equilibria, IAS theory combined with the O’Brien and Myers model did not show any improvement over the IAS theory with Langmuir model. Sensitivity analysis showed that large sensitivities of dependent variables to independent variables can give large deviations in the prediction of binary component adsorption. This motivated the use of the error-in-variables method, which was shown to be superior to conventional least-squares in calculating the Wilson binary parameters for the prediction of ternary component equilibria with O2-N2-CO adsorption data on zeolite 10X. Smaller deviations in the predictions of total amount of adsorption were found from the parameters regressed by EVM, but the errors in the prediction of mole fraction were not reduced significantly compared to the traditional least squares approach.
[References]
  1. Talu O, Myers AL, AIChE J., 34, 1887, 1988
  2. Kemeny S, Manczinger J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 33, 71, 1978
  3. Kemeny S, Manczinger J, Skjold-Jorgense S, Toth K, AIChE J., 28, 20, 1982
  4. Richter E, Schutz W, Myers AL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 44, 1609, 1989
  5. Ritter JA, Yang RT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 1679, 1987
  6. High MS, Danner RP, AIChE J., 32, 1138, 1986
  7. Reilly PM, Patino-Leal H, Technometrics, 23, 221, 1981
  8. O'Brien JA, Myers AL, J. Chem. Soc.-Faraday Trans., 1467, 1984
  9. O'Brien JA, Myers AL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 27, 2085, 1988
  10. Myers AL, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 11, 121, 1965
  11. Suwanayuen S, Danner RP, AIChE J., 26, 68, 1980
  12. Cochran TW, Kabel RL, Danner RP, AIChE J., 31, 268, 1985
  13. Talu O, Myers AL, AIChE J., 34, 1931, 1988
  14. Valko P, Vajda S, Comput. Chem. Eng., 11, 37, 1987
  15. Kim IW, Liebman MJ, Edgar TF, AIChE J., 36, 985, 1990
  16. Edgar TF, Himmelblau DM, "Optimization of Chemical Processes," McGraw Hill, 1988
  17. Danner RP, Wenzel LA, AIChE J., 15, 515, 1969
  18. Cochran TW, Kabel RL, Danner RP, AIChE J., 31, 2075, 1985
  19. Dorfman LR, Danner RP, AIChE Symp. Ser., 71, 30, 1975
  20. Hyun SH, Danner RP, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 27, 196, 1982