Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.2, 518-523, 2010
Surface hydrophobicity alteration of fractionated paraffin wax, crude by-product polyolefin wax and their blend
The surface compositions of crude by-product polyolefin wax (wax K) from a naphtha cracking unit, fractionated commercial paraffin wax (wax J) and their blend (wax M) were compared, under various conditions, by using FT-IR. Then a practical criterion was theoretically derived by back-of-the-envelope-calculation to estimate the diffusivity for the surface enrichment of hydrophilic functional groups. The hydrophobicity in terms of chemical structure and functional groups was altered by changing the environment as well as by blending wax K with wax J. The surface properties of wax J and wax M turned out more hydrophobic than that of wax K within the experimental period of water-submerged condition, even though the structure and functional groups on the surfaces of all waxes under ambient atmospheric condition are extremely similar. Thus the blend of wax M behaved unlike wax K but similarly to wax J in terms of alteration of hydrophobicity. Such values of diffusivity as 1.35×10^(-11) cm2/s and 1.96×110^(-11) cm2/s are established for wax J and wax M, respectively, under 1 day water-submerged condition. Furthermore, under 1 week watersubmerged condition, the values of their diffusivity for wax J, wax K and wax M are estimated as 3.06×10^(-12) cm2/s, 7.23×10^(-11) cm2/s and 1.50×10^(-11) cm2/s, respectively. The obtained values of diffusivity are consistent, in terms of the order of magnitude, with the value of diffusion coefficient of 5.75×10^(-11) cm2/s obtained, using a very complicated empirical-formula, by Chen et al. for the investigation of surface-modifier enrichment. Thus, the suggested criterion may be very useful and practically applied to clarify the process of surface enrichment from general polymer-blends.
[References]
  1. Schuman T, Wikstrom M, Rigdahl M, Progress in Organic Coatings, 51, 228, 2004
  2. Schuman T, Adolfsson B, Wikstrom M, Rigdahl M, Progress in Organic Coatings, 54, 188, 2005
  3. Schuman T, Karlsson A, Larsson J, Wikstrom M, Rigdahl M, Progress in Organic Coatings, 54, 360, 2005
  4. Zhao X, Evans JRG, Edirisinghe MJ, Song JH, Ceramics International, 29, 887, 2003
  5. Mpanza HS, Luyt AS, Polymer Testing., 25, 436, 2006
  6. Heimbach JT, Bodor AR, Douglass JS, Barraj LM, Cohen SC, Biles RW, Faust HR, Food Chem. Toxicol., 40, 555, 2002
  7. Mariya M, Nikolay J, J. Food Eng., 51, 235, 2002
  8. Eccleston GM, Behan-Martin MK, Jones GR, Towns-Andrews E, International Journal of Pharmaceuticals, 203, 127, 2000
  9. Regin AF, Solanki SC, Saini JS, Renew. Energy, 31, 2025, 2006
  10. He B, Setterwall F, Energy Conv. Manag., 43(13), 1709, 2002
  11. Schultz J, Carre A, Mazeau C, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 4, 163, 1984
  12. Lavielle L, Lischetti G, Sanfeld A, Schultz J, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 138, 134, 1990
  13. Kenneth BL, Buddy DR, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 159, 77, 1993
  14. Qian H, Zhang YX, Huang SM, Lin ZY, Appl. Surf. Sci., 253(10), 4659, 2007
  15. Jackson ST, Short RD, J. Mater. Chem., 2, 259, 1992
  16. Jones RAL, Kramer EJ, Rafailovich MH, Sokolove J, Schwartz SA, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 280, 1989
  17. Tanaka K, Takahara A, Kajiyama T, Macromolecules, 31(3), 863, 1998
  18. Helfand E, Wasserman ZR, Macromolecules, 9, 879, 1976
  19. Agarwal US, Dutta A, Mashelkar RA, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49(11), 1693, 1994
  20. Khayet M, Vazquez Alvarez M, Khulbe KC, Matsuura T, Surf. Sci., 601, 885, 2007
  21. Gains GL, Macromolecules, 5, 82, 1972
  22. Chen HJ, Shi XH, Zhu YF, Zhang Y, Xu ER, Appl. Surf. Sci., 254(6), 1763, 2008
  23. Qian H, Lin ZY, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 23, 875, 2005