Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.2, 431-434, 2010
Effect of preparation method on structure and catalytic activity of Cr-promoted Cu catalyst in glycerol hydrogenolysis
Relationships between surface structure and catalytic properties were investigated for a series of copper chromium catalysts. The catalysts were prepared using methods involving impregnation and precipitation, and their catalytic activities were evaluated for the hydrogenolysis of glycerol. Catalyst (10I and 50I) prepared by the impregnation method contained a mixed phase of both individual copper and chromium oxide structures, while the catalyst (50P) prepared by precipitation showed a single phase, with a copper chromite spinel structure (CuCr2O4). XPS data indicated that, after the reduction step, the copper species in the impregnated catalyst was reduced to Cu^(0), but the catalyst prepared by the precipitation method retained a spinel structure evidenced by the large amount of Cu^(2+) species. In hydrogenolysis reactions, the precipitated catalyst showed a higher catalytic activity than the impregnated catalyst. Thus, the reduced copper chromite spinel structure, which constitutes a single phase, appears to be responsible for the high catalytic activity in the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol.
[References]
  1. McKendry P, Bioresour. Technol., 83(1), 37, 2002
  2. McKendry P, Bioresour. Technol., 83(1), 47, 2002
  3. Chheda JN, Huber GW, Dumesic JA, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 46, 7164, 2007
  4. Clark JH, Budarin V, Deswarte FEI, Hardy JJE, Kerton FM, Hunt AJ, Luque R, Macquarrie DJ, Milkowski K, Rodriguez A, Samuel O, Tavener SJ, White RJ, Wilson AJ, Green Chem., 8, 853, 2006
  5. Pagliaro M, Ciriminna R, Kimura H, Rossi M, Pina CD, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 46, 4434, 2007
  6. Behr A, Eilting J, Irawadi K, Leschinski J, Lindner F, Green Chem., 10, 13, 2008
  7. Yang L, Joo JB, Kim YJ, Oh S, Kim ND, Yi J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(5), 1014, 2008
  8. Song SH, Lee SH, Park DR, Kim HS, Woo SY, Song WS, Kwon MS, Song IK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 26(2), 382, 2009
  9. Soares RR, Simonetti DA, Dumesic JA, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 45, 3982, 2006
  10. Dasari MA, Kiatsimkul PP, Sutterlin WR, Suppes GJ, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 281(1-2), 225, 2005
  11. Chiu CW, Dasari MA, Sutterlin WR, Suppes GJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(2), 791, 2006
  12. Martin AE, Murphy FH, 4th ed. Krik-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 17, 715 Wiley, New York, 1994
  13. Jalowiecki L, Daage M, Bonnelle JP, Tchen AH, Appl. Catal., 16, 1, 1985
  14. Makarova OV, Yureva TM, Kustova GN, Ziborov AV, Plyasova LM, Minyukova TP, Davydova LP, Zaikovskii VI, Kinet. Catal., 34, 608, 1993
  15. Crivello M, Perez C, Herrero E, Ghione G, Casuscelli S, Rodriguez-Castellon E, Catal. Today, 107-108, 215, 2005
  16. Dai WL, Sun Q, Deng JF, Wu D, Sun YH, Appl. Surf. Sci., 177(3), 172, 2001
  17. Plyasova LM, Solovyeva LP, Krieger TA, Makarova OV, Yurieva TM, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 105, 61, 1996