Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.27, No.1, 110-115, 2010
Application of activated carbon fiber (ACF) for arsenic removal in aqueous solution
The adsorption of arsenic from aqueous solution using activated carbon fiber (ACF) was investigated. Several series of experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of operating parameters such as equilibrium time, flow rate, and initial concentration that affect to the adsorption rate. Average removal efficiency was 24% for the initial arsenic concentration of 10 mg/L to 17 mg/L. Breakthrough point in ACF unit reached at 5 hours of the experimental operation for aqueous solution containing arsenic. Adsorption capacity of the filter was found to be 0.18 mg/mg of ACF. With the increase of flow rate there was a slight increase in the removal of arsenic. Field tests from thirty contaminated sites in Sonarang, Bangladesh have shown that the arsenic removal efficiency was only 13.0% in the single ACF unit, while it was increased upto 24.6% in two ACF units in series. Among the several fitting regression curves tested, three dimensional non-linear regressions gave over 90% fitting, while for other linear regression curves it was in the range of 5 to 92% depending upon the various operating parameters. Non-linear models described the relationships of C with C(0) and t better than the linear ones, and this model gives a good generalization of the kinetics of arsenic in ACF for the laboratory tested ranges.
[References]
  1. Mohapatra D, Mishra D, Chaudhury GR, Das RP, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 426, 2007
  2. Prapasawat T, Ramakul P, Satayaprasert C, Pancharoen U, Lothongkum AW, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 158, 2008
  3. USEPA, Drinking water regulations and health advisories, Washington, D.C., USA, 1993
  4. Reinoso FR, Sabio MFM, Munecas MA, Phyical Chemistry, 270, 1992
  5. Miltner RJ, Summers RS, Dugan NR, Koechling M, Moll D, Proceedings, 1996 American Water Works Association Water Quality Technology Conference, New York, 1996
  6. Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, NY, 2003
  7. Donnet JB, Qin RY, Park SJ, Ryu SK, Rhee BS, Material Science, 12, 122, 1993
  8. Ryu SK, Rhee BS, Lee JK, Pusset N, Ehrburger P, Proceedings of carbon’90, Paris, 96, 1990
  9. Shu L, Lee SH, Jegatheesan V, Environ. Eng. Res., 17, 75, 2002
  10. Speth TF, Miltner RJ, J. of the American Water Works Association, 72, 1990
  11. Lee SH, Park JC, Brissonneau D, Environ. Eng. Res., 8, 107, 2003
  12. McNair RN, Arons GN, Carbon adsorption handbook, Chapter 22, Ann Arbor Science Pub., 819, 1977
  13. Baek I, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(5), 553, 2000
  14. Lu AH, Zheng ZT, Carbon, 40, 1353, 2002
  15. Bade R, Lee SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 239, 2006
  16. Ohmori S, Sen-I Gakkaishi, 167, 1985
  17. Park SJ, Kim YM, Desalination, 27, 276, 2004
  18. Crittenden JC, Hand DW, Arora H, Lykins Jr. BW, J. of the American Water Works Association, 74, 1987
  19. Lee SH, Vigneswaran S, Ahn KH, Environ. Eng. Res., 13, 353, 1997
  20. Jegatheesan V, Lee SH, Visvanathan C, Shu L, Marzella M, Environ. Eng. Res., 4, 283, 1999
  21. Hong EH, Jung YH, Lee KH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 17(2), 237, 2000
  22. Brasquet C, Subrenat E, Le Cloirec P, Wat. Sci. Tech., 39, 201, 1999
  23. Hu Z, Lei L, Li Y, Ni Y, Separation and Purification Technology, 31, 2003
  24. Kaneko K, Setoyama N, Suzuki T, Elsevier Science, 87, 593, 1994
  25. Bade R, Lee SH, Jo S, Lee HS, Lee SE, Desalination, 229(1-3), 264, 2008