Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.5, 1286-1290, 2009
Improving the SO2 absorption rate of CeFeMg-based sorbent promoted with titanium promoter
To improve the poor SO2 absorption rate of CeFeMgTi sorbent with high sulfur removal capacity and fast regeneration, a new sorbent, CeFeMgTi-sol was prepared by the modified co-precipitation method and tested in a packed bed reactor at RFCC conditions (sulfation of MgO to MgSO4 in the presence of low concentration of SO2 at 973 K, regeneration of MgSO4 to MgO and H2S in the presence of H2 at 803 K). The CeFeMgTi-sol sorbent showed excellent SO2 absorption and sulfur removal capacity (46.2 sulfur g/g absorbent×100). It was found that the SO2 absorption rates were related to the structure of the Mg and Ti and the textural properties such as surface area and pore volume. In the case of the fresh state of CeFeMgTi sorbent, CeO2, MgO and MgTiO3 structures were observed. But the new CeFeMgTisol sorbent before SO2 absorption, showed a separated MgO and TiO2 peak only. These differences in the sorption rates were discussed by the difference in the XRD pattern, surface area and pore volume.
[References]
  1. McCauley JR, US Patent, 5,990,030, 1999
  2. Wang JA, Chen LF, Li CL, J. Mol. Catal. A, 139, 315, 1999
  3. Wang JA, Li CL, Appl. Surf. Sci., 161(3-4), 406, 2000
  4. Wang JA, Zhu AL, Li CL, J. Mol. Catal. A, 139, 31, 1999
  5. Johannessen T, Koutsopoulos S, J. Catal., 205, 404, 2001
  6. Dawody J, Skoglundh M, Fridell E, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 209(1-2), 215, 2004
  7. Rosso I, Saracco G, Specchia V, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(2), 222, 2003
  8. Yoo JS, Bhattacharyya AA, Radlowski CA, Appl. Catal. B, 1, 169, 1992
  9. Corma A, Palomares AE, Rey F, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 4(1), 29, 1994
  10. Yoo JS, Bhattacharyya AA, Radlowski CA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 31, 1252, 1992
  11. McCauley JR, US Patent 6,129,833, 2000
  12. Wang JA, Chen LF, Limas-Ballesteros R, Montoya A, Dominguez JM, J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem., 194(1-2), 181, 2003
  13. Kim G, US patent 5,627,123, 1997
  14. Albers EW, US patent 6,338,831, 2000
  15. Strehlau W, US patent 6,338,945, 2002
  16. Chen SLF, US patent, 6,923,945, 2005
  17. Jae LS, Jun HK, Jung SY, Lee TJ, Ryu CK, Kim JC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(26), 9973, 2005
  18. Cantu M, Salinas EL, Valente JS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9715, 2005
  19. Jung SY, Jun HK, Lee SJ, Lee TJ, Ryu CK, Kim JC, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 9324, 2005
  20. Lee SJ, Jung SY, Lee SC, Jun HK, Ryu CK, Kim JC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., accepted.