Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.2, 592-602, 2009
Reactivity of a CaSO4-oxygen carrier in chemical-looping combustion of methane in a fixed bed reactor
Chemical-looping combustion (CLC) is a promising technology for the combustion of gas or solid fuel with efficient use of energy and inherent separation of CO2. A reactivity study of CaSO4 oxygen carrier in CLC of methane was conducted in a laboratory scale fixed bed reactor. The oxygen carrier particles were exposed in six cycles of alternating reduction methane and oxidation air. A majority of CH4 reacted with CaSO4 to form CO2 and H2O. The oxidation was incomplete, possibly due to the CaSO4 product layer. The reactivity of CaSO4 oxygen carrier increased for the initial cycles but slightly decreased after four cycles. The product gas yields of CO2, CH4, and CO with cycles were analyzed. Carbon deposition during the reduction period was confirmed with the combustible gas (CO+H2) in the product gas and slight CO2 formed during the early stage of oxidation. The mechanism of carbon deposition and effect was also discussed. SO2 release behavior during reduction and oxidation was investigated, and the possible formation mechanism and mitigation method was discussed. The oxygen carrier conversion after the reduction decreased gradually in the cyclic test while it could not restore its oxygen capacity after the oxidation. The mass-based reaction rates during the reduction and oxidation also demonstrated the variation of reactivity of CaSO4 oxygen carrier. XRD analysis illustrated the phase change of CaSO4 oxygen carrier. CaS was the main reduction product, while a slight amount of CaO also formed in the cyclic test. ESEM analysis demonstrated the surface change of particles during the cyclic test. The reacted particles tested in the fixed bed reactor were not uniform in porosity. EDS analysis demonstrated the transfer of oxygen from CaSO4 to fuel gas while leaving CaS as the dominant reduced product. The results show that CaSO4 oxygen carrier may be an interesting candidate for oxygen carrier in CLC.
[References]
  1. Lyngfelt A, Leckner B, Mattisson T, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(10), 3101, 2001
  2. Ishida M, Jin HG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(7), 2469, 1996
  3. Jin HG, Okamoto T, Ishida M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(1), 126, 1999
  4. Mattisson T, Johansson M, Lyngfelt A, Energy Fuels, 18(3), 628, 2004
  5. Cho P, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Fuel, 83, 1215, 2004
  6. Johansson M, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Energy Fuels, 20(6), 2399, 2006
  7. Mattisson T, Johansson M, Lyngfelt A, Fuel, 85, 736, 2006
  8. Adanez J, de Diego LF, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, Abad A, Palacios JM, Energy Fuels, 18(2), 371, 2004
  9. de Diego LF, Garcia-Labiano F, Gayan P, Celaya J, Palacios JM, Adanez J, Fuel, 86, 1036, 2007
  10. Corbella BM, de Diego L, Garcia-Labiano F, Adanez J, Palacios JM, Energy Fuels, 20(1), 148, 2006
  11. Adanez J, Gayan P, Celaya J, de Diego LF, Garcia-Labiano F, Abad A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(17), 6075, 2006
  12. Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Jin GT, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 960, 2003
  13. Ryu HJ, Bae DH, Han KH, Lee SY, Jin GT, Choi JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(6), 831, 2001
  14. Ryu HJ, Jin GT, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 527, 2007
  15. Ryu HJ, Lim NY, Bae DH, Jin GT, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 157, 2003
  16. Song KS, Seo YS, Yoon HK, Cho SJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(3), 471, 2003
  17. Son SR, Kim SD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(8), 2689, 2006
  18. Shen LH, Zheng M, Xiao J, Zhang H, Xiao R, Sci. China Ser. E: Technol. Sci., 50, 230, 2007
  19. Shen L, Zheng M, Xiao J, Xiao R, Combust. Flame, 154, 489, 2008
  20. Shen L, Wu J, Xiao J, Combust. Flame, 156, 721, 2009
  21. Mattisson T, Jardnas A, Lyngfelt A, Energy Fuels, 17(3), 643, 2003
  22. Andrus HEJ, Chiu JH, Stromberg PT, Thibeault PR, in 22nd Annual international pittsburgh coal conference, Pittsburgh, U.S.A., 2005
  23. Wang JS, Anthony EJ, Appl. Energy, 85(2-3), 73, 2008
  24. Anthony EJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 1747, 2008
  25. Song QL, Xiao R, Deng ZY, Zhang HY, Shen LH, Zhang MY, Energy Conver. and Manage., 49, 3178, 2008
  26. Xiao R, Shen L, Zhang M, Jin B, Xiong Y, Duan Y, Zhong Z, Zhou H, Chen X, Huang Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(1), 175, 2007
  27. Xiao R, Zhang MY, Jin BS, Huang YJ, Zhou HC, Energy Fuels, 20(2), 715, 2006
  28. Zhou H, Jin B, Zhong Z, Huang Y, Xiao R, Zheng Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24(3), 489, 2007
  29. Marban G, Garcia-Calzada M, Fuertes AB, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(1), 77, 1999
  30. Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Cho P, Fuel, 80, 1953, 2001
  31. Abad A, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Johansson M, Fuel, 86, 1021, 2007
  32. de Diego LF, Gayan P, Garcia-Labiano F, Celaya J, Abad M, Adanez J, Energy Fuels, 19(5), 1850, 2005
  33. Qiu K, Mattisson T, Steenari BM, Lindqvist O, Thermochim. Acta, 298(1-2), 87, 1997
  34. Qiu KR, Lindqvist O, Mattisson T, Fuel, 78(2), 225, 1999
  35. Cho P, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(4), 668, 2005
  36. Cho P, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45(3), 968, 2006
  37. Johansson M, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Abad A, Fuel, 87, 988, 2008
  38. Jin H, Ishida M, Fuel, 83, 2411, 2004
  39. Song QL, Xiao R, Li YB, Shen LH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47, 4349, 2008
  40. Berguerand N, Lyngfelt A, Fuel, 87, 2713, 2008
  41. Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Thermochim. Acta, 325(1), 59, 1999
  42. Fernandez MJ, Lyngfelt A, Steenari BM, Energy Fuels, 14(3), 654, 2000
  43. Sohn HY, Kim BS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(13), 3081, 2002
  44. Dennis JS, Hayhurst AN, Chem. Eng. Sci., 45, 1175, 1990
  45. Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Energy Fuels, 12(5), 905, 1998
  46. Anthony EJ, Granatstein DL, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 27(2), 215, 2001
  47. Johansson M, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(22), 6978, 2004
  48. Davies NH, Laughlin KM, Hayhurst AN, Symposium (International) on Combustion, 25, 211, 1994
  49. Davies NH, Hayhurst AN, Combust. Flame, 106, 359, 1996
  50. Marban G, Garcia-Calzada M, Fuertes AB, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(4), 495, 1999