Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.2, 324-331, 2009
The comparison study on the operating condition of gasification power plant with various feedstocks
Abstract.Gasification technology, which converts fossil fuels into either combustible gas or synthesis gas (syngas) for subsequent utilization, offers the potential of both clean power and chemicals. Especially, IGCC is recognized as next power generation technology which can replace conventional coal power plants in the near future. It produces not only power but also chemical energy sources such as H2, DME and other chemicals with simultaneous reduction of CO2. This study is focused on the determination of operating conditions for a 300 MW scale IGCC plant with various feedstocks through ASPEN plus simulator. The input materials of gasification are chosen as 4 representative cases of pulverized dry coal (Illinois#6), coal water slurry, bunker-C and naphtha. The gasifier model reflects on the reactivity among the components of syngas in the gasification process through the comparison of syngas composition from a real gasifier. For evaluating the performance of a gasification plant from developed models, simulation results were compared with a real commercial plant through approximation of relative error between real operating data and simulation results. The results were then checked for operating characteristics of each unit process such as gasification, ash removal, acid gas (CO2, H2S) removal and power islands. To evaluate the performance of the developed model, evaluated parameters are chosen as cold gas efficiency and carbon conversion for the gasifier, power output and efficiency of combined cycle. According to simulation results, pulverized dry coal which has 40.93% of plant net efficiency has relatively superiority over the other cases such as 33.45% of coal water slurry, 35.43% of bunker-C and 30.81% of naphtha for generating power in the range of equivalent 300 MW.
[References]
  1. US DOE Office of Fossil Energy, Gasification world database 2007, NETL DOE (2007)
  2. ASPEN plus 2006 Manual, ASPEN Tech (2006)
  3. Williams A, Pourkashanian M, Jones JM, Skorupska N, Combustion and gasification of coal, Taylor & Francis Inc., 86-88 (1999)
  4. Gerold Gottlicher, The energetics of carbon dioxide capture in power plant, 71-72, NETL DOE (2004)
  5. Watanabe H, Otaka M, Fuel, 85, 1935, 2006
  6. Liu GS, Niksa S, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30, 682, 2004
  7. Higman C, van der Burgt M, Gasification, Gulf Professional Publishing, 25-26, 133 (2003)
  8. Eldrid R, Kaufman L, Marks P, The 7FB: The next evolution of the F gas turbine, GE Power Systems, GER4194 (2004)
  9. Lee C, Kim HT, Energy Engg. J., 5, 160, 1996
  10. Lee SJ, Yun YS, Yu JY, Seo IJ, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 37, 777, 1999
  11. Process Engineering Division, Texaco gasifier IGCC base cases, NETL DOE, Report PED-IGCC-98-001 (2000)
  12. Process Engineering Division, Shell gasifier IGCC base cases, NETL DOE, Report PED-IGCC-98-002 (2000)
  13. Zheng L, Furinsky E, Energy Conversion & Management, 46, 1773, 2005
  14. Lee SJ, Lee JW, Yun YS, Energy Engg. J., 6, 183, 1997