Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.1, 160-164, 2009
Improvement of sensitivity in an interferometry by controlling pore size on the anodic aluminum oxide chip pore-widening technique
The pore size of an anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) chip, as well as uniform pore distribution, is one of the key parameters that should be adjusted, by choosing the appropriate etching conditions, in order to enhance the sensitivity of an interferometer. In this study, the pore size of AAO chips was optimized and characterized in order to lower the detection limit of prostate specific antigen (PSA) in an interferometric immunoassay system. After pore widening for 30-50 min, the AAO pore size was increased approximately 2-fold larger than that before pore widening. A large increase in effective optical density (ΔEOT) was obtained from the AAO chip fabricated by pore-widening technique, which thereby lowered the PSA detection limit. The present study results are not sufficiently validated to enable the immediate application to immunoassay for prostate cancer (PCa) screening, but they do demonstrate that controlling pore size can positively affect the sensitivity and lower the detection limit.
[References]
  1. Schwartz MP, Alvarez SD, Sailor MJ, Anal. Chem., 79, 327, 2007
  2. Gao T, Rothberg LJ, Anal. Chem., 79, 7589, 2007
  3. Janshoff A, Dancil KPS, Steinem C, Greiner DP, Lin VSY, Gurtner C, Motesharei K, Sailor MJ, Ghadiri MR, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 120(46), 12108, 1998
  4. Lee JC, An JY, Kim BW, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 82(11), 1045, 2007
  5. Park JS, Lim SH, Sim SJ, Chae H, Yoon HC, Yang SS, Kim BW, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 16, 1968, 2006
  6. Lee W, Nielsch K, Gosele U, Nanotechnology, 18, 475713, 2007
  7. Ghorbani M, Nasirpouri F, Irajizad A, Saedi A, Mater. Des., 27, 983, 2006
  8. Ji GB, Chen W, Tang SL, Gu BX, Li Z, Du YW, Solid State Commun., 130, 541, 2004
  9. Lee I, Wool RP, Thin Solid Films, 379(1-2), 94, 2000
  10. Metzger RM, Konovalov VV, Sun M, Xu T, Zangari G, Xu B, Benakli M, Doyle WD, IEEE Trans. Magn., 36, 30, 2000
  11. Mizeikisa V, Juodkazis S, Marcinkevicius A, Matsuo S, Misawa H, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C: Photochem. Rev., 2, 35, 2001
  12. Sui YC, Saniger JM, Mater. Lett., 48, 127, 2001
  13. Huang L, Reekmans G, Saerens D, Friedt JM, Frederix F, Francis L, Muyldermans S, Campitelli A, Van Hoof C, Biosens. Bioelectron., 21, 483, 2005
  14. Cao C, Kim JP, Kim BW, Chae H, Yoon HC, Yang SS, Sim SJ, Biosens. Bioelectron., 21, 2106, 2006
  15. Wesseling S, Stephan C, Semjonow A, Lein M, Brux B, Sinha P, Loering SA, Jung K, Clin. Chem., 49, 887, 2003
  16. Fernadez-Sanchez C, McNeil CJ, Rawson K, Nilsson O, Anal. Chem., 76, 5649, 2004
  17. Balk SP, Ko YJ, Burbley GJ, J. Clin. Oncol., 21, 383, 2003
  18. Healy DA, Hayes CJ, Leonard P, McKenna L, O’Kennedy R, Trends Biotechnol., 25, 125, 2007
  19. Oberpenning F, Hetzel S, Weining C, Brandt B, Angelis GA, Heinecke A, Lein M, Fornara P, Schmid H, Hertle L, Semjonow A, Eur. Urol., 43, 478, 2003
  20. Masuda H, Fukuda K, Science, 268(5216), 1466, 1995
  21. Hwang SK, Jeong SH, Hwang HY, Lee OJ, Lee KH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(3), 467, 2002