Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.1, 102-107, 2009
Studies on auramine dye adsorption on psidium guava leaves
Removal of auramine dye from aqueous waste solutions was investigated by using very cheap and biosorbent, withered guava tree leaves and activated carbon. Guava leaves are readily available in the western and northern parts of India throughout the year, and hence form a cost effective alternative for removal of dyes from waste waters. The optimum contact time was found to be 120 min. in a pH range of 8-9 for 92-94% removal of the dye from aqueous solutions containing 150 mg/L of auramine dye using 2 g of the adsorbent. The effect of pH, dye concentration, sorbent dosage, temperature and contact time on the dye removal efficiency has been studied. Experimental results were found to fit both Freundlich and Langmuir models. Since the dye contains a cationic species, the removal efficiency was highest in a pH range of 8-9. Continuous adsorption studies in a packed column showed 100% removal efficiency for a flow rate of 10 ml·min^(-1). When compared with the activated carbon, it was also found that adsorbent derived from guava leaves is more efficient in removal of dye.
[References]
  1. Malik PK, Dyes Pigments, 56, 239, 2003
  2. Sanghi R, Bhattacharya B, Color Technol., 118, 256, 2002
  3. Stephenson RJ, Sheldon JB, Wat. Res., 30, 761, 1996
  4. Low KS, Lee CK, Tan KK, Env. Tech., 14, 115, 1993
  5. Churchley JH, Removal of dye wastewater colour from sewage effluent: The use of full scale effluent, Cooper P (Ed.), Society of dyers and colourists, Bradford. U.K. (1994)
  6. Mall S, Upadhayay N, Ind. J. Ener. Health, 40, 177, 1998
  7. Mackay G, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 32, 759, 1982
  8. Makay G, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 32, 717, 1981
  9. Annadurai G, Juang RS, Lee DJ, Adv. Environ. Res., 6, 191, 2002
  10. El-Geundi MS, Adsorp. Sci. Technol., 15, 777, 1997
  11. Allen SJ, Makay G, Khader KYH, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 45, 291, 1989
  12. Poots VJP, Mckay G, Healy JJ, J. Water Poll. Control Fed., 50, 926, 1978
  13. Lodha A, Bohra K, Singh SV, Gupta AB, Ind. J. of Env. Protec., 17, 675, 1997
  14. Allen SJ, Makay G, Khader KYH, Env. Pol., 56, 39, 1989
  15. Alley ER, Water quality control handbook, McGraw-Hill, Vo. 8, 126 (2000)
  16. El-Geundi MS, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 11, 109, 1994
  17. Allen SJ, MacKay G, Khader KYH, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 45, 29, 1989
  18. Annadurai G, Chellapandian M, Krishnan MRV, Environ. Monitor. Assess., 59, 111, 1999
  19. Poots VJP, McKay G, Healy JJ, Water Pollut. Control Fed., 50, 926, 1978
  20. Hall KR, Eagletion LC, Acrivos A, Verumeulen T, Ind. Engg. Chem. Fund., 5, 212, 1966
  21. McKay G, Blair H, Gardiner JR, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 28, 1499, 1989
  22. Zhang Q, Chuang KT, Adv. Environ. Res., 3, 251, 2001
  23. Fu Y, Viraraghvan T, Adv. Environ. Res., 7, 239, 2002
  24. Khare SK, Pandey KK, Srivastava RM, Singh VN, J. Chemical Technol. Biotechnol., 38, 99, 1987
  25. Ho YS, Adsorption, 7, 139, 2001
  26. Singh VN, Singh IS, Rai US, Indian J. Chem., 21A, 247, 1982
  27. Pandey KK, Prasad G, Singh VN, Wat. Res., 19, 869, 1985
  28. Srivastava SK, Tyagi R, Pant N, Wat. Res., 9, 1161, 1989