Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.26, No.1, 72-78, 2009
Computational fluid dynamic analyses of catalytic combustors for 100 kW-class molten carbonate fuel cell
The asymmetric inner structure of a catalytic combustor causes wall cracking because of regional overheating. Thus, a symmetric shape is proposed in the present work and analyses of the computational fluid dynamics of the existing combustor and the proposed type have been performed. A simulation of the revised combustor without a swirl device revealed that the flow of gases is concentrated on the center of the combustor and only catalysts around the center are used. In the revised combustor with a swirl device, the overall temperatures were estimated to be uniform. However, near the swirl device, high temperature exceeding 1,700 K was measured. Therefore, a heatproof surface coating on the swirl device is necessary for protection of the material. At the initial start-up of the catalytic combustor, hydrogen and natural gas are used. When only natural gas is used, the simulation indicated that the gas does not burn in the revised combustor without a swirl device. However, in the combustor with the swirl device, methane of 34.8% volume burns in the simulation. On the other hand, when hydrogen and natural gas are burned together, methane of 91.7% volume burns in the simulation.
[References]
  1. Groppi G, Tronconi E, Forzatti P, Berg M, Catal. Today, 59(1-2), 151, 2000
  2. Seo YS, Kang SK, Han MH, Baek YS, Catal. Today, 47(1-4), 421, 1999
  3. Beebe KW, Cairns KD, Pareek VK, Nickolas SG, Schlatter JC, Tsuchiya T, Catal. Today, 59(1-2), 95, 2000
  4. FLUENT 6.2 User Guide, FLUENT Inc. (2003)
  5. Launder BE, Spalding DB, Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence, Academic Press, London, England (1972)
  6. Magnussen BF, Hjertager BH, On mathematical models of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion, In 16th Symp. (Int’l.) on Combustion. The Combustion Institute (1976)
  7. Ergun S, Chem. Eng. Prog., 48, 89, 1952
  8. Seo YS, Song KS, Kang SK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(5), 819, 2003
  9. Sadamori H, Catal. Today, 47(1-4), 325, 1999