Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.24, No.6, 980-988, 2007
Media configuration and recirculation of upflow anaerobic floating filter for piggery wastewater treatment
An upflow anaerobic floating filter media (UAFF) reactor was applied to the treatment of synthetic and real piggery wastewater. The effect of media configuration and internal recirculation on the system performance was studied. In the first experiment, three-UAFF reactors filled with different media, i.e., polypropylene beads, sponge cubes and coconut fiber were continuously fed with synthetic wastewater at upflow velocity of 0.04 m h.1. The COD removal efficiency in the reactor filled with sponge cubes was highest at 90%, whereas the others filled with polypropylene beads and coconut fibers with lower specific surface area were about 80%. In the second experiment, three-UAFF reactors with sponge were applied to treat real piggery wastewater. COD removal efficiencies were found to be about 80% and methane production rate of 0.26 l lr-1d-1. The system performance could be slightly improved by 10% when applying internal recirculation. A sludge blanket (60-70% of total biomass) plays an important role in the system when applied to the treatment of piggery wastewater containing high suspended solid concentration.
[References]
  1. Henze M, Harremoes P, Water Sci. Technol., 15, 1, 1983
  2. Shu L, Lee SH, Jegatheesan V, Environ. Eng. Res., 17(2), 75, 2002
  3. Lee SH, Park JC, Brissonneau D, Environ. Eng. Res., 8(3), 107, 2003
  4. Lee MG, Hano T, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(2), 178, 2001
  5. Salkinoja-Salonen MS, Nyns EJ, Sutton PM, van den Berg L, Wheatley ED, Water Sci. Technol., 15, 305, 1983
  6. APHA, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed. American Public Health Association, Washington D.C., 1998
  7. Schiener P, Nachaiyasit S, Stuckey DC, Environ. Technol., 19, 391, 1998
  8. Park JH, Park JK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 83, 2003
  9. Aquino SF, Stuckey DC, Water Sci. Technol., 45, 127, 2002
  10. Barker DJ, Mannucchi GA, Salvi SM, Stuckey DC, Water Res., 33, 2499, 1999
  11. Kuo WC, Sneve MA, Parkin GF, Wat. Environ. Res., 68, 279, 1996
  12. Noguera DR, Araki N, Rittmann BE, Water Sci. Technol., 30, 339, 1994
  13. Goodwin JAS, Wase DAJ, Forster CF, Bioresour. Technol., 41, 71, 1992
  14. van Loosdrecht MCM, Eikelbloom D, Gjaltema A, Mulder A, Tijhuis L, Heijnen JJ, Water Sci. Technol., 32, 35, 1995
  15. Park JA, Hur JM, Son BS, Lee JH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(4), 486, 2001
  16. Zeeman G, Sutter K, Vens T, Koster M, Wellinger A, Biological Wastes, 26, 15, 1988
  17. Chen MJ, Zhang Z, Bott TR, Biotechnol. Tech., 12, 875, 1998
  18. Noguera DR, Araki N, Rittmann BE, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 44(9), 1040, 1994
  19. Poels J, Assche P, Van P, Verstraete W, Biotechnol. Lett., 6, 747, 1984
  20. Tay JH, Jeyaseelan S, Show KY, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 453, 1996
  21. Hudson JW, Pohland FG, Pendergrass D, Proceeding of the 33rd Industrial Waste Conference, May 9, 10 and 11, 1978, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich., 560-574, 1978
  22. LO KV, LIAO PH, GAO YC, Bioresour. Technol., 47(2), 153, 1994
  23. Elmitwalli TA, Zandvoort MH, Zeeman G, Bruning H, Lettinga G, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 177, 1999
  24. Jegatheesan V, Lee SH, Visvanathan C, Shu L, Marzella M, Environ. Eng. Res., 4(4), 283, 1999
  25. Domingues MR, Araujo JC, Varesche MBA, Vazoller RF, Water Sci. Technol., 45, 27, 2002
  26. Ranade DR, Garade RV, Microbiological Aspects of Anaerobic Digestion: Laboratory Manual, Maharashtra Association for the Cultivation of Science, Research Institute, India, 1988
  27. Ng WK, Jegatheesan VR, Lee SH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 23(2), 333, 2006