Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.24, No.3, 471-476, 2007
Mass transfer and kinetics study on the sulfite forced oxidation with manganese ion catalyst
Wet limestone scrubbing is the most common flue gas desulfurization process (FGD) for control of sulfur dioxide emissions from the combustion of fossil fuels. Forced oxidation, which controls the overall reaction of the sulfur dioxide absorption, is the key path of the process. Manganese which comes from the coal is one of the catalysts during the forced oxidation process. In the present work, the two-film theory was used to analyze the sulfite forced oxidation reaction with an image boundary recognition technique, and the oxidation rate was experimentally studied by contacting pure oxygen with a sodium sulfite solution. There was a critical sulfite concentration 0.328 mol/L without catalyst or at a constant catalyst concentration value. The kinetics study focused on the active energy of the reaction and the reaction constant k; furthermore, we obtained the order with respect to the sulfite and Mn2+ concentrations. When the Mn2+ catalyst concentration was kept unchanged, the sulfite oxidation reaction rate was controlled by dual film and the reaction kinetics was first order with respect to sulfite while SO32- concentration was below 0.328mol/L; the sulfite oxidation reaction rate was controlled by gas film only and the reaction kinetics was zero order with respect to sulfite while SO32- concentration over 0.328mol/L. When SO32- concentration was kept unchanged, the sulfite oxidation reaction rate depended on gas-liquid mass transfer and the reaction kinetics was different in various stages with respect to Mn2+ concentrations.
[References]
  1. Linek V, Vacek V, Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 1747, 1981
  2. Whitman WG, Chem. and Met. Eng., 29, 147, 1923
  3. Higbie R, Trans. Am. Inst. of Chem. Eng., 31, 365, 1935
  4. Danckwerts PV, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43, 1460, 1951
  5. Toor HL, Marchello JM, AIChE J., 16, 513, 1970
  6. Weisnicht WL, Overman L, Wang CC, Wang HL, Erwin J, Hudson JL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 35, 463, 1980
  7. Pasiuk-Bronikowska W, Bronikowski T, Chem. Eng. Sci., 36, 215, 1981
  8. Huss A, Lim PK, Eckert CA, J. Phys. Chem., 86, 4224, 1982
  9. Pasiuk-Bronikowska W, Ziajka J, Chem. Eng. Sci., 40, 1567, 1985
  10. Ulrich RK, Rochelle GT, Prada RE, Chem. Eng. Sci., 41, 2183, 1986
  11. Bronikowski T, Pasiuk-Bronikowska W, Chem. Eng. Sci., 44, 1361, 1989
  12. Ziajka J, Pasiuk-Bronikowska W, Chem. Eng. Sci., 44, 915, 1989
  13. Lancia A, Musmarra D, Prisciandaro M, Tammaro M, Chem. Eng. Sci., 54(15-16), 3019, 1999
  14. Lee HK, Deshwal BR, Yoo KS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(2), 208, 2005
  15. Zhao B, Li Y, Tong HL, Zhuo YQ, Zhang L, Shi H, Chen CH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(3), 863, 2005
  16. Backstrom HLJ, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 49, 1460, 1927
  17. Danckwerts PV, Gas-liquid reaction, McGraw-Hill Publications, New York, 1970
  18. Mishra GC, Srivastava RD, J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol., 26, 401, 1976
  19. Shen DX, He ZY, Wang YR, Environ. Chem., 12, 99, 1993