Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.24, No.2, 361-367, 2007
Gaseous mercury removal in a hybrid particulate collector
Gaseous mercury removal from simulated flue gas by sorbent injection was estimated and the effect of an electric field applied to a particulate collector on mercury removal was analyzed. For this, a bench scale system which included a sorbent injection reactor and a hybrid particulate collector was made up. The hybrid particulate collector consisted of an electrostatic precipitator and a fabric filter. Activated carbon was injected into the reactor as a sorbent. According to the result of experiment using simulated gas prepared by injecting gaseous mercury into air, the mercury removal by activated carbon injection at 130 ℃ varied from around 3.9% at C/Hg ratio of 1,000 up to around 24.4% at C/Hg ratio of 50,000 including reaction in the hybrid particulate collector. When C/Hg ratio was fixed at 10,000 and temperature was changed from 50 ℃ to 150 ℃, the mercury removal decreased from 43.2% to 1.9%. In addition, when high voltage was applied to the hybrid particulate collector, the mercury removal increased up to 63.1% at a C/Hg ratio of 5,000 and at a temperature of 130 ℃. Considering baseline mercury removal efficiency of up to 50% in the utility boilers due to the acid gases containing in the flue gas, above results indicate that 90% or more of gaseous mercury could be removed.
[References]
  1. Toole-O’Neil B, Tewalt SJ, Finkelman RB, Akers DJ, Fuel, 78, 47, 1999
  2. Meji R, Vredenbregt L, Winkel H, Presented at the combined power plant air pollutant control mega symposium, Chicago, Illinois, May, 2001
  3. Vehlow J, Environ. Technol., 3, 144, 1996
  4. Brown TD, Smith DN, Hargis RA, O’Dowd WJ, J. Air & Waste Management Association, June, 1, 47, 1997
  5. U. S. EPA Mercury Study Report to U.S. Congress, 1997
  6. McLarnon CR, Steen D, Presented at the combined power plant air pollutant control mega symposium, Washington DC, May, 2003
  7. Pavlish JH, Sondreal EA, Mann MD, Olson ES, Galbreath KC, Laudal DL, Benson SA, Fuel Processing Technology, 82, 2003
  8. Chen S, Rostam-Abadi M, Chang R, Preprints of Papers - American Chemical Society Division Fuel Chemistry, 41, 442, 1996
  9. Brintnell RR, MS Thesis, University of North Dakota, Department of Chemical Engineering, May, 2000
  10. Hall B, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 80, 301, 1995
  11. NIST Chemistry Webbook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69, 2005
  12. Hall B, Lindqvist O, Ljungstrom E, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1, 1990
  13. L'vov BV, Thermochim. Acta, 333(1), 21, 1999
  14. Miller SJ, Dunham GE, Olson ES, Brown TD, Fuel Processing Technology, 65-66, 343, 2000
  15. Norton GA, Yang H, Brown RC, Laudal DL, Dunham GE, Erjavec J, Fuel, 82, 107, 2003