Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.24, No.2, 246-252, 2007
Removal of copper from industrial wastewaters by activated carbon prepared from periwinkle shells
The present study aims at the removal of copper from industrial wastewater by using a low - cost adsorbent. Activated periwinkle shell carbon (PSC) was prepared and characterized for various physiochemical properties. To determine copper removal capacity, the performance of PSC was compared with commercial activated carbon (CAC) and a mixture of activated periwinkle shell carbon and commercial activated carbon (PSC : CAC) in a ratio 1 : 1. The effect of adsorbent dose, contact time, pH, agitation speed and adsorbent particle size was studied for adsorption of copper from wastewater under batch conditions. The result obtained showed that PSC competes favourably with CAC. The maximum adsorption capacity was observed for PSC : CAC with 88.12% removal at an optimal pH of 8. The PSC and CAC had 84.19% removal and 85.15% removal, respectively. The equilibrium data obtained fitted both the Langmuir and the Freundlich models. Good correlation coefficients were obtained for the pseudo-second-order kinetic model.
[References]
  1. World Health Organization, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality, Geneva, 1984
  2. Gupta VK, Ali I, Sep. Purif. Technol., 18, 131, 2000
  3. Homburger F, Hayes JA, Pelikan EWA, Guide to general toxicology, KARGER, New York, 1983
  4. Kang CD, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20, 3, 2003
  5. Blanco AB, Sanz B, Llama MJ, Serra JL, J. Biotechnol., 69, 1999
  6. Blanchard G, Maunaye M, Martin G, Water Res., 18, 1501, 1984
  7. Gloaguen V, Morvan H, J. Environ. Sci. Health, A32, 901, 1997
  8. Jeon C, Park JY, Yoo YJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(6), 955, 2001
  9. Kim SJ, Jeung SY, Moon H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(6), 637, 1998
  10. Lee SH, Jung CH, Chung H, Lee MY, Yang JW, Process Biochem., 33, 205, 1998
  11. Moffat AS, Science, 269(5222), 302, 1995
  12. Lujan JR, Damall DW, Stark PC, Rayson GD, Gardea-Torresday, Solvent Extr. Ion Exch., 12, 803, 1994
  13. Gardea-Torresdey JL, Tiemann KJ, Gonzalez JH, Henning JA, Townsend MS, J. Hazard. Mater., 57, 29, 1996
  14. American Public Health Association, Standard methods for examination of wastewater, 17th Ed., New York, 1985
  15. Goltermann HL, Method for physical and chemical analysis of fresh water, Well scientific publications, 2nd Ed., Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1978
  16. Ho YS, John Wase DA, Forster CF, Water Res., 29, 5, 1995
  17. Low KS, Lee CK, Lee KP, Bioresour. Technol., 44, 109, 1993
  18. Baes GB, Mesmer RE, Hydrolysis of Ca ions, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1976
  19. Gau JX, Chen YA, Huang SD, Proc. Nat. Sci. Rep. China, 9(3), 228, 1985
  20. Knocke WR, Hemphill LM, Water Res., 15, 245, 1981
  21. Domenico PA, Schwartz FW, Physical and chemical hydrogeology, 1st Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990
  22. Reddi LN, Inyang HI, Geo-environmental engineering principles and applications, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, 2000
  23. Nitzsche O, Vereecken H, Mine Water and the Environment, 21, 15, 2002
  24. Gaikward RW, EJEAFChe, 3, 4, 2004
  25. Mohan D, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 2002