Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.24, No.1, 93-98, 2007
Fluorescence in situ hybridization and INT-dehydrogenase activity test to assess the effect of DO concentration in aerobic biofilm reactor
To assess the effect of DO concentration in aerobic biofilm reactor, we investigated the bacterial communities and their activity utilizing the combination of two methods, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and INTdehydrogenase activity test. D-1, D-2, D-3 and D-4 reactor with different DO concentrations (1, 3, 5 and 7 mg/L, respectively) were set up in the thermostat and acclimated. The optimal DO concentration with stable nitrification efficiency in aerobic biofilm reactor was above 5.0 mg/L. FISH method showed us that higher DO concentration led to the increase of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria ratios and the decrease of heterotrophs ratio. The INT-DHA activities of each reactor were 203, 153, 36 and 45 mgO2*/g VSS/day, respectively. The INT-DHA activities in D-1 and D-2 reactors were higher than those of D-3 and D-4 reactors, which indicates that filamentous microorganisms affected the INT-DHA activity. In the case of D-3 and D-4 reactors, as nitrification efficiency increased, INT-DHA activity also increased. In the relationship between the attached biomass and nitrification efficiency, only active biomass influenced the nitrification efficiency.
[References]
  1. Awong J, Bitton G, Koopman B, Water Res., 19, 917, 1985
  2. Bitton G, Koopman B, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 43, 964, 1982
  3. Daims H, Bruhl A, Amann R, Schleifer KH, Wagner M, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 22, 434, 1999
  4. Daims H, Nielsen PH, Nielsen JL, Juretschko S, Wagner M, Water Sci. Technol., 41, 85, 2000
  5. Imat T, Kusuda T, Furumat H, Kinetic study and mathematical modeling of biofilm in an anaerobic fluidized bed, In Proc. 2nd Int. Specialized Conf. on Biofilm Reactors, Paris, France, 463-470, 1993
  6. Jang A, Bishop PL, Okabe S, Lee SG, Kim IS, Water Sci. Technol., 47, 49, 2002
  7. Kim CW, Koopman B, Bitton G, Water Res., 28, 1117, 1994
  8. Kim DJ, Ahn DH, Lee DI, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(1), 85, 2005
  9. Koopman B, Bitton G, Logue C, Bossart JM, Lopez JM, Validity of tetrazolium reduction assays for assessing toxic inhibition of filamentous bacteria in activated sludge, In Toxicity Screening Procedures using Bacterial Systems, 147-162, NY, USA, 1984
  10. Lazarova NR, Manem J, Melo L, Water Sci. Technol., 37, 189, 1998
  11. Lazarova V, Pierzo V, Fontviell D, Manem J, Water Sci. Technol., 29, 345, 1994
  12. Liu Y, Capdeville B, Water Res., 30, 1645, 1996
  13. Mobarry BK, Wagner M, Urbain V, Rittmann E, Stahl DA, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 62, 2156, 1996
  14. Park TJ, Lee KH, Kim DS, Kim CW, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 9, 1996
  15. Lee KH, Lee JH, Park TJ, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 15(1), 9, 1998
  16. Schramm A, De Beer D, Wagner M, Amann R, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 64, 3480, 1998
  17. Sharrma B, Ahlert RC, Water Res., 11, 897, 1977
  18. Surmacz-Gorska J, Cichon A, Miksch K, Proceedings of the Env. Biotech., 1, 78, 1996
  19. Wagner M, Rath G, Koops HP, Flood J, Amann R, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 237, 1996
  20. Wang B, Yang O, Liu R, Yuan J, Ma F, He J, Li G, Water Sci. Technol., 24, 197, 1991
  21. Yang H, Jiang Z, Shi S, Tang WZ, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 53, 416, 2002
  22. Zhang TC, Bishop PL, Water Environ. Res., 68, 1107, 1996