Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.23, No.3, 367-373, 2006
Strength and microscopic characteristics of alkali-activated fly ash-cement
The effects of different activator concentration, liquid/fly ash ratio, and curing temperature and time on the compressive strength of specimens prepared from low-calcium fly ash activated with sodium hydroxide without the use of Portland cement were investigated. SEM, XRD and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) were used to observed the structural feature, reaction products, and porosity and pore-size distribution of the specimens from alkaliactivated fly ash, respectively. It was found that the degree of reactivity, as shown by the compressive strength, the activator concentration and the ratio of liquid/fly ash, and the curing temperature always result to be significative factors. The 7, 14, and 28-day compressive strengths of specimens prepared from alkali-activated fly ash by 5M NaOH solution at 50 °C are 152, 219, and 263 kgf/cm2, while those from 6M solution are 184, 225, and 267 kgf/cm2, respectively. In SEM observation, the fly ash activated by the 5M NaOH solution shows a more continuous matrix with solid and non porous due to subsequent gel restructuring by amorphous alkaline aluminosilicate produced from alkali-activated fly ash.
[References]
  1. Arjunan P, Silsbee MR, Roy DM, “Chemical activation of low calcium fly ash: part: identification of the most appropriate activators and their dosage,” Proceedings of the Intl. Ash Utilization Symposium, Kentucky, 2001
  2. Bakharev T, Sanjayan JG, Cheng YB, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1629, 1999
  3. Davidovits J, J. Mater. Eng., 16, 91, 1994
  4. Fernandez-Jimenez A, Puertas F, Palomo JG, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1313, 1999
  5. Guerrero A, Goni S, Macias A, Luxan MP, J. Mater. Res., 14(6), 2680, 1999
  6. Katz A, Cem. Concr. Res., 28, 197, 1998
  7. Lorenzo MP, Goi S, Guerrero A, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85, 3071, 2002
  8. Luxan MP, Scnchez de Rohas MI, Frias M, Cem. Concr. Res., 19, 69, 1989
  9. Ma W, Liu C, Brown PW, Komarneni S, Cem. Concr. Res., 25, 417, 1995
  10. Majiling J, Roy DM, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 72, 77, 1993
  11. Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1323, 1999
  12. Pietersen HS, Fraay LA, Bijen JM, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 178, 139, 1990
  13. Puertas F, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Cem. Concr. Compos., 25, 287, 2003
  14. Puertas F, Martinez-Ramirez S, Alonso S, Vazquez T, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 1625, 2000
  15. Rostami H, Brendley W, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37, 3454, 2003
  16. Shi C, Day RL, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 51, 2000
  17. Shi C, Day RL, Cem. Concr. Res., 30, 607, 2000
  18. VanJaarsveld JGS, VanDeventer JSJ, Lorenzen L, Miner. Eng., 10(7), 659, 1997
  19. Wesche K, Fly ash in concrete-properties and performance, the international union of testing and reswarch laboratories for materials and structures (RILEM), Report of Technical Committee 67-FAB, E&FN SPON, London, 1991
  20. Williams PJ, Biernacki JJ, Walker LR, Meyer HM, Rawn CJ, Bai J, Cem. Concr. Res., 32, 963, 2002