Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.22, No.6, 857-864, 2005
Sorption and Desorption Kinetics of Chlorophenols in Hexadecyltrimethyl Ammonium-Montmorillonites and Their Model Analysis
Sorption and desorption kinetics of chlorophenols, 2-chlorophenol (2-ChP), 2,4-dichlorophenol (2,4-DChP) and 2,4,5-trichlorophenol (2,4,5-TChP), in montmorillonite modified with hexadecyltrimethyl ammonium cations (HDTMA-mont) were investigated by using laboratory batch adsorbers. To investigate the effect of chemical concentration and sorbent weight on the sorption or desorption rate constants, the initial chemical concentration and sorbent weight were varied from 50 to 150mg/L and from 0.2 to 1.0 g, respectively. A one-site mass transfer model (OSMTM) and two compartment first-order kinetic model (TCFOKM) were used to analyze kinetics. The OSMTM applicable to desorption rate analysis was newly derived. As expected from the number of model parameters involved, the threeparameter TCFOKM was better than the two-parameter OSMTM in describing sorption and desorption kinetics of chlorophenols in HDTMA-mont. The mass transfer coefficient for sorption (ks) in OSMTM generally increased as Kow value increases, except for 2,4,5-TChP, while the mass transfer coefficient for desorption (kd) consistently increases as Kow value decreases, due to the weaker hydrophobic interaction between the solute and the organoclay. Since most sorption and desorption complete in an hour and half an hour, respectively, kd values were found to be greater than ks values for all three solutes studied. The fraction of the fast sorption (or desorption) and the first-order sorption (or desorption) rate constants for the fast and slow compartments in TCFOKM were determined by fitting experimental data to the TCFOKM. The results of kinetics reveal that the fraction of the fast sorption or desorption and the sorption rate constants in the fast and slow compartments were in the order 2,4,5-TChP>2,4-DChP>2-ChP, which agrees with the magnitude of the octanol-water partition coefficient, Kow. The first-order sorption rate constants in the fast and slow compartments were found to vary 101-102 hr.1 and 10.3-10.2 hr.1, respectively. However, the desorption rate constants in the fast and slow compartments were not correlated well with Kow. The first-order desorption rate constants in the fast compartment (101-102 hr.1) were found to be much larger than those in the slow compartment (10.3-10.4 hr.1). Sorption affinity and desorption resistance of each chlorophenol in 50% HDTMA-mont were found to show the same tendency: the weakly-sorbed chlorophenol (i.e., 2-ChP) was easily desorbed, while the strongly-sorbed chlorophenol (i.e., 2,4,5-TChP) was rather resistant to desorption.
[References]
  1. Boyd SA, Lee JF, Martland MM, Nature, 333, 345, 1988
  2. Boyd SA, Mortland MM, Chiou CT, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 52, 652, 1988
  3. Boyd SA, Method of Removing Hydrocarbon Contaminants from Air and Water with Organophilic, Quaternary Ammonium Ion-ex-changed Smectite Clay, U.S. Patent 5,628,109, 1993
  4. Brusseau ML, Rao PSC, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 1501, 1991
  5. Burris DR, Antworth CP, J. Contam. Hydrol., 10, 325, 1992
  6. Carrizosa MJ, Koskinen WC, Hermosin MC, Cornejo J, Appl. Clay Sci., 18, 223, 2001
  7. Cornelissen G, van Noort PCM, Govers HAJ, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 16, 1351, 1997
  8. Crocker FH, Guerin WF, Boyd SA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 29, 2953, 1995
  9. Deitsch JJ, Smith JA, Arnold MB, Bolus J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 3169, 1998
  10. Dentel SK, Bottero JY, Khatib K, Demougeot H, Duguet JP, Anselme C, Water Res., 29, 1273, 1995
  11. Gullick RW, Weber WJ, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 1523, 2001
  12. Huh JK, Song DI, Jeon YW, Sep. Sci. Technol., 35, 243, 2000
  13. Kim YS, Song DI, Jeon JW, Choi SJ, Sep. Sci. Technol., 31(20), 2815, 1996
  14. Lee JF, Crum J, Boyd SA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 23, 1365, 1989
  15. Li J, Smith JA, Winquist AS, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 3089, 1996
  16. Lo IMC, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 122, 850, 1996
  17. Lo IMC, Lijestrand HM, Waste Manage. Res., 14, 297, 1996
  18. Lo IMC, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 123, 25, 1997
  19. Lo IMC, Yang X, Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 620, 2001
  20. Lo IMC, Yang XY, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 127, 154, 2001
  21. Lo IMC, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 127, 756, 2001
  22. Nye JV, Guerin WF, Boyd SA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 28, 944, 1994
  23. Nzengung VA, Nkedi-Kizza P, Jessup RE, Voudrias EA, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1470, 1997
  24. Opdyke DR, Loehr RC, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1193, 1999
  25. Scherer MM, Richter S, Valentine RL, Alvarez PJJ, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 363, 2000
  26. Schrap SM, Slejipen GLG, Seinen W, Opperhuizen A, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 1, 81, 1994
  27. Smith JA, Jaffe PR, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 120, 1559, 1994
  28. Srinivasan KR, Fogler HS, Clay Clay Min., 38, 277, 1990
  29. Verschueren K, Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals, van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York, 1977
  30. Wu Z, Cong Y, Zhou M, Ye Q, Tan T, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 19(5), 866, 2002
  31. Zhang PC, Sparks DL, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 57, 340, 1993
  32. Zhu L, Li Y, Zhang J, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1407, 1997