Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.22, No.1, 1-8, 2005
Risk Assessment of Membrane Type LNG Storage Tanks in Korea-based on Fault Tree Analysis
For a liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage tank, the greatest concern is for the release of a large amount of LNG or its vapor due to the mechanical failures of main tank and its ancillary equipments or the malfunctions of various hardware components. Nowadays two types of LNG storage tank design, that is, 9%-Ni full containment and membrane concepts, are mostly applied to LNG industry. In Korea the membrane type has been nationally adopted from the beginning step of LNG project because of its higher flexibility in storage capacity comparing to the 9%-Ni type. All the while several huge membrane-type tanks have been built up and operating, the quantified results of risk associated with them has not been systematically delineated. Hence the method of fault tree analysis as a quantitative risk assessment has been here employed to identify and evaluate the risks related to the membrane-type LNG storage tank. Six top events leading greatly to the large release of natural gas are defined as internally induced major accidents and the failure frequencies of these events are calculated by using other sources of process equipment reliability data for the lack of membrane type-specific data.
[References]
  1. Atallah S, Shah JN, Betti M, "Reduction of LNG Operator Error and Equipment Failure Rates," GRI-90/0008, Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL, USA, 1990
  2. "Advanced Light Water Reactor Utility Requirements Document (Volume III)-Chapter 1, Appendix A, PRA Key Assumptions and Ground Rules," Electric Power Research Institute, Inc., USA, 1995
  3. "BS7777"British Standards Institute, 1993
  4. Crowl DA, Louvar JF, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Prentice Hall P T R, Prentice-Hall, Inc., NJ, USA, 1990
  5. Giribone R, Claude J, "Comparative Safety Assessment of Large LNG Storage Tanks," Eleventh International Conference on LNG, 3.10, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 1995
  6. "Guidelines for Process Equipment Reliability Data with Data Tables," center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY, USA, 1989
  7. "Guide to the Collection and Representation of Electronic, Sensing Component, and Mechanical Equipment Reliability Data for Nuclear Generating Stations," IEEE Standard 500-1984, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Enginers, New York, NY, USA, 1984
  8. Han SH, "KAERI Integrated Reliability Analysis Code Package (KIRAP)," Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Korea, 1999
  9. Johnson EM, Welker JR, "Development of an Improved LNG Plant Failure Rate Data Base," GRI-80-0093, Gas Research Institute, Chicago, IL, USA, 1980
  10. "Offshore Reliability Data Handbook", OREDA-97, SINTEF Industrial Management, Norway, 1997
  11. "Procedures for Treating Common Cause Failures in Safety and Reliability Studies," U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-4780 and Electric Power Research Institute Report NP-5613, January, 1988
  12. Theofanous TG, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 54, 243, 1996
  13. Welker JR, Schorr HP, "LNG Plant Experience Data Base," American Gas Association 1979 Operation Section Proceedings, A.G.A., Arlington, VA, USA, 1979