Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.21, No.4, 836-852, 2004
An Optimization Strategy for Nonlinear Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography: Multi-Level Optimization Procedure (MLOP)
This paper presents a multi-level optimization strategy to obtain optimum operating conditions (four flowrates and cycle time) of nonlinear simulated moving bed chromatography. The multi-level optimization procedure (MLOP) approaches systematically from initialization to optimization with two objective functions (productivity and desorbent consumption), employing the standing wave analysis, the true moving bed (TMB) model and the simulated moving bed (SMB) model. The procedure is constructed on a non-worse solution property advancing level by level and its solution does not mean a global optimum. That is, the lower desorbent consumption under the higher productivity is successively obtained on the basis of the SMB model, as the two SMB-model optimizations are repeated by using a standard SQP (successive quadratic programming) algorithm. This approach takes advantage of the TMB model as well as surmounts shortcomings of the TMB model in the general case of any nonlinear adsorption isotherm using the SMB model. The MLOP is evaluated on two nonlinear SMB cases characterized by i) quasi-linear/nonequilibrium and ii) nonlinear/nonequilibrium model. For the two cases, the MLOP yields a satisfactory solution for high productivity and low desorbent consumption within required purities.
[References]
  1. Beste YA, Lisso M, Wozny G, Arlt W, J. Chromatogr. A, 868, 169, 2000
  2. Biressi G, Ludemann-Hombourger O, Mazzotti M, Nicoud RM, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 876, 3, 2000
  3. Chang SC, "Courant Number Insensitive CE/SE Schemes," 38th AIAA Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-2002-3890, Indianapolis, USA, 2002
  4. Juza M, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, Trends Biotechnol., 18, 108, 2000
  5. Kim YD, Lee JK, Cho YS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 18(6), 971, 2001
  6. Klatt KU, Dunnebier G, Hanisch F, Engell S, AIChE Symp. Ser., 98, 239, 2002
  7. Lee KN, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(3), 532, 2003
  8. LimYI, Chang CS, Jorgensen SB, Comput. Chem. Eng., in press, 2004
  9. Lim YI, Jorgensen SB, Chem. Eng. Sci., in press, 2004
  10. Lim YI, Floquet P, Joulia X, Kim SD, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(12), 4729, 1999
  11. Ludemann-Hombourger O, Pigorini G, Nicoud RM, Ross DS, Terfloth G, J. Chromatogr. A, 947, 59, 2002
  12. Ma Z, Wang NH, AIChE J., 43(10), 2488, 1997
  13. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 769, 3, 1997
  14. Melis S, Markos J, Cao G, Morbidelli M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(10), 3629, 1996
  15. Motz S, Mitrovic A, Gilles ED, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(20), 4329, 2002
  16. Pais LS, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE, Sep. Purif. Technol., 20, 67, 2000
  17. Pais LS, Loureiro JM, Rodrigues AE, AIChE J., 44(3), 561, 1998
  18. Powell MJD, J. Inst. Math. Appl., 7, 21, 1971
  19. Proll T, Kusters E, J. Chromatogr. A, 800, 135, 1998
  20. Strube J, Altenboner U, Meurer M, J. Chromatogr. A, 769, 81, 1997
  21. Wu DJ, Ma Z, Wang NHL, J. Chromatogr. A, 855, 71, 1999
  22. Xie Y, Wu DJ, Ma ZD, Wang NHL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(6), 1993, 2000
  23. Zhang ZY, Hidajat K, Ray AK, Morbidelli M, AIChE J., 48(12), 2800, 2002
  24. Zhang Z, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 989, 95, 2003