Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.21, No.2, 454-464, 2004
Continuous Chromatographic Processes with a Small Number of Columns: Comparison of Simulated Moving Bed with Varicol, PowerFeed, and ModiCon
The Simulated Moving Bed process and its recent extensions called Varicol, PowerFeed and ModiCon are studied, in the case where a small number of columns are used, i.e. from three to five. A multiobjective optimization approach, using genetic algorithms and a detailed model of the multicolumn chromatographic process, is applied to optimize each process separately, and allow for comparison of the different operating modes. The non-standard SMB processes achieve better performance than SMB, due to the availability of more degrees of freedom in the operating conditions of the process, namely the way to carry out asynchronous switches for Varicol, and the different flow rates and feed concentration during the switching interval for PowerFeed and for ModiCon, respectively. We also consider the possibility of combining two non-standard operating modes in a new hybrid process, and evaluate also in this case the possible performance. Finally, a critical assessment of the results obtained and of the potential for practical implementation of the different techniques is reported.
[References]
  1. Abel S, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 944, 23, 2002
  2. Antos D, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(23), 6667, 2001
  3. Bhaskar V, Gupta SK, Ray AK, Rev. Chem. Eng., 16, 1, 2000
  4. Biressi G, Ludemann-Hombourger O, Mazzotti M, Nicoud RM, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 876, 3, 2000
  5. Denet F, Hauck W, Nicoud RM, Di Giovanni O, Mazzotti M, Jaubert JN, Morbidelli M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(21), 4603, 2001
  6. DiGiovanni O, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, Denet F, Hauck W, Nicoud RM, J. Chromatogr. A, 919, 1, 2001
  7. Houwing J, Jensen TB, van Hateren SH, Billiet HAH, van der Wielen LAM, AIChE J., 49(3), 665, 2003
  8. Jensen TB, Reijns TGP, Billiet HAH, vanderWielen LAM, J. Chromatogr. A, 873, 149, 2000
  9. Kearney MM, Hieb KL, U.S. Patent, 5,102, 1992
  10. Kloppenburg E, Gilles ED, Chem. Eng. Technol., 22(10), 813, 1999
  11. Ludemann-Hombourger O, Nicoud RM, Bailly M, Sep. Sci. Technol., 35(12), 1829, 2000
  12. Ludemann-Hombourger O, Pigorini G, Nicoud RM, Ross DS, Terfloth G, J. Chromatogr. A, 947, 59, 2002
  13. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 769, 3, 1997
  14. Mazzotti M, Storti G, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 786, 309, 1997
  15. Migliorini C, Wendlinger M, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(12), 2606, 2001
  16. Nicoud RM, Perrut M, French Patent, 9,205, 1992
  17. Pais LS, Rodrigues AE, J. Chromatogr. A, 1006, 33, 2003
  18. Schramm H, Kaspereit M, Kienle A, Seidel-Morgenstern A, Chem. Eng. Technol., 25(12), 1151, 2002
  19. Schramn H, Kaspereit M, Kienle A, Seidel-Morgenstern A, J. Chromatogr. A, 1006, 77, 2003
  20. Storti G, Masi M, Paludetto R, Morbidelli M, Carra S, Comput. Chem. Eng., 12, 475, 1988
  21. Toumi A, Engell S, Ludemann-Hombourger O, Nicoud RM, Bailly M, J. Chromatogr. A, 1006, 15, 2003
  22. Zang YF, Wankat PC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(10), 2504, 2002
  23. Zang YF, Wankat PC, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41(21), 5283, 2002
  24. Zhang ZY, Hidajat K, Ray AK, Morbidelli M, AIChE J., 48(12), 2800, 2002
  25. Zhang Z, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, AIChE J., 50, 625, 2004
  26. Zhang Z, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 989, 95, 2003
  27. Zhang Z, Mazzotti M, Morbidelli M, J. Chromatogr. A, 1006, 87, 2003