The objectives of this research are to identify the membrane fouling potential due to different fractions of NOM and correlate the physicochemical properties of NOM and membranes with the adsorption of humic substances on membrane and investigate the mechanism of coagulation affecting UF, and find the optimum conditions of the combined of coagulation with UF membrane filtration for NOM removal. For Nakdong river water, the humic acid fraction was the most reactive precursor fraction for the formation of the ratio of THMFP/DOC (STHMFP) and TOXFP/DOC (STOXFP). The result of adsorption kinetics tests showed that hydrophobic organics adsorbed much more quickly than hydrophilic organics on both membranes. Thus, hydrophobic compounds exhibited a preferential adsorption onto membrane. In case of the effect of membrane properties on the adsorption of organic fractions, the adsorption ratio (Ct/Ce) was greater for the hydrophobic membrane than for the hydrophilic membrane regardless of the kind of organic fractions. For combined coagulation with membrane process, flux reduction rate showed lower than the UF process alone. Also, the rate of flux decline for the hydrophobic membrane was considerably greater than for the hydrophilic membrane. Applying the coagulation process before membrane filtration showed not only reduced membrane fouling, but also improved removal of dissolved organic materials that might otherwise not be removed by the membrane. That is, during the mixing period, substantial changes in particle size distribution occurred under rapid and slow mixing conditions due to the simultaneous formation of microflocs and NOM precipitates. Therefore, combined pretreatment using coagulation (both rapid mixing and slow mixing) improved not only dissolved organic removal efficiency but also DBP (Disinfection By-Product) precursor’s removal efficiency.
Croue JP, Martin B, Deguin A, Legube B, "Isolation and Characterization of Natural Organic Matter from Surface Water/Comparison of Resin Adsorption and Membrane Filtration Isolation Procedure," Natural Organic Matter Workshop, Poitiers, France, September '96, 6, 1996
Fu P, Ruiz H, Thompson K, Spangenberg C, J. Am. Water Works. Assoc., 86(12), 55, 1994
Hermia J, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 60, 183, 1982
Jacangelo JG, Laine JM, Cummings EW, Adham SS, J. Am. Water Works. Assoc., 87(3), 100, 1995
Jung CW, Han SW, Kang LS, J. Korea Soc. Environ. Eng., 24(8), 1339, 2002
Jung CW, "Removal of Natural Organic Matter by Combined Coagulation-UF Membrane Process for Water Treatment," Ph.D., Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, Pukyong National University, Busan, 2002
Logan BE, Jiang Q, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 116(6), 1046, 1990
McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P, "Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering," McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A., 1985
Summer RS, Hooper SM, Shukairy HM, Solaril G, Owen D, J. Am. Water Works. Assoc., 88(6), 80, 1996
Thurman E, Malcolm R, Environ. Sci. Technol., 15(4), 463, 1981
Tipping E, Ohnstad M, Chem. Geol., 44, 349, 1984
Wiesner MR, Lahoussine-Turcaud V, Fiessinger F, "Organic Removal and Particle Formation using a Partially Neutralized AlCl3," in Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Water Works Association, Denver, CO, 1986