Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.40, No.1, 97-103, 2023
Characteristics of La-doped Pt/Al2O3 catalyst prepared by solvent-deficient method and effect on enhancement of dehydrogenation of perhydrodibenzyltoluene
Liquid organic hydrogen carrier (LOHC) materials have been under the spotlight for the storage, transport and extraction of hydrogen. In particular, the catalytic process for extracting hydrogen from LOHC requires a fairly high level of catalytic technology due to several important issues, such as saving energy consumption due to endothermic reaction, minimizing consumption of LOHC for recycle, and high purity of hydrogen produced. This study focused on the development of La-doped Pt/Al2O3 catalyst with high activity for the dehydrogenation of perhydrodibenzyltoluene (H18-DBT), which is well-known as a LOHC compound. The dehydrogenation performance of the La-doped Pt/Al2O3 catalyst was different depending on the La content it contained. A variety of characterization techniques are used to identify the performance differences of the catalysts. As revealed by the analyses of chemisorption, TEM and XPS, the number of lanthanum oxide particles on the surface of the catalyst increases and block the active sites of platinum, as the amount of La doped in the catalyst increases. However, by donating electrons from lanthanum oxide to platinum, the activity per unit active site of Pt increases. The Pt/La-Al2O3 catalyst doped with 1wt% La showed much higher activity than that of the Pt/Al2O3, and showed the best performance among the catalysts doped with various amounts of La. In addition, it was found through spin-lattice relaxation analysis that La doping by solution-deficient method did not have a positive effect on the Pt dispersion by creating Al3+ penta sites inside the alumina particle rather than on the surface.
[References]
  1. Brückner N, Obesser K, Bösmann A, Teichmann D, Arlt W, Dungs J, Wasserscheid P, ChemSusChem, 7, 229, 2014
  2. Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Safari A, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 981, 2012
  3. Felderhoff M, Weidenthaler C, von Helmolt R, Eberle U, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 2643, 2007
  4. Teichmann D, Arlt W, Wasserscheid P, Freymann R, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 2767, 2011
  5. Preuster P, Papp C, Wasserscheid P, Acc. Chem. Res., 50, 74, 2017
  6. Rao PC, Yoon M, Energies, 13, 6040, 2020
  7. Modisha P, Bessarabov D, Sustain. Energy Fuels, 4, 4662, 2020
  8. Akhtar MS, Dickson R, Liu JJ, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 9, 17152, 2021
  9. Shi L, Qi S, Qu J, Che T, Yi C, Yang B, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44, 5345, 2019
  10. Ali A, Rohini AK, Noh YS, Moon DJ, Lee HJ, Int. J. Energy Res., 46, 6672, 2022
  11. Modisha PM, Jordaan JH, Bösmann A, Wasserscheid P, Bessarabov D, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 43, 5620, 2018
  12. Trueba M, Trasatti SP, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 2005, 3393, 2005
  13. Kwak JH, Hu JZ, Kim DH, Szanyi J, Peden CH, J. Catal., 251, 189, 2007
  14. Kwak JH, Hu J, Mei D, Yi CW, Kim DH, Peden CH, Allard LF, Szanyi J, Science, 325, 1670, 2009
  15. Lee J, Jang EJ, Oh DG, Szanyi J, Kwak JH, J. Catal., 385, 204, 2020
  16. Shi L, Deng GM, Li WC, Miao S, Wang QN, Zhang WP, Lu AH, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 54, 13994, 2015
  17. Garidzirai R, Modisha P, Shuro I, Visagie J, van Helden P, Bessarabov D, Catalysts, 11, 490, 2021
  18. Sánchez-Sánchez M, Navarro R, Fierro J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 32, 1462, 2007
  19. Song JH, Yoo S, Yoo J, Park S, Gim MY, Kim TH, Song IK, Mol. Catal., 434, 123, 2017
  20. Huang B, Bartholomew CH, Smith SJ, Woodfield BF, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 165, 70, 2013
  21. Smith SJ, Huang B, Bartholomew CH, Campbell BJ, Boerio-Goates J, Woodfield BF, J. Phys. Chem. C, 119, 25053, 2015
  22. Jeong H, Kwon O, Kim BS, Bae J, Shin S, Kim HE, Kim J, Lee H, Nat. Catal., 3, 368, 2020
  23. Kim CH, Lee MW, Jang JS, Lee SH, Lee KY, Fuel, 313, 122654, 2022
  24. Sugiura Y, Nagatsuka T, Kubo K, Hirano Y, Nakamura A, Miyazawa K, Iizuka Y, Furuta S, Iki H, Higo T, Chem. Lett., 46, 1601, 2017
  25. Yang X, Song Y, Cao T, Wang L, Song H, Lin W, Mol. Catal., 492, 110971, 2020