Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.11, 2916-2924, 2022
Development of real time responding hydrogen fueling protocol and its risk assessment
Existing hydrogen fueling protocols (HFP), such as SAE J2601, have limitations in low efficiency and limited applicability for various vehicle types. They use lookup tables or formulas constructed by simulation and do not calculate the optimal fueling strategy in real-time. To address this issue, we proposed a real-time responding HFP (RTR-HFP) in our previous study and further improved the RTR-HFP in this study. We introduced a tuning parameter to transform the simplified model from the extreme case to the real case, and we can determine a less conservative pressure ramp rate (PRR) by RTR-HFP in real-time. In addition, to avoid unstable fueling issues when the storage system pressure is too low, we integrated the RTR-HFP with the existing table-based strategy and determined the best PRR while restricting the upper bound on PRR. Furthermore, we performed a risk assessment of the fueling system and found a solution to ensure the safety integrity level in the control system.
[References]
  1. Schneider J, Meadows G, Mathison SR, Veenstra MJ, Shim J, Immel R, Wistoft-Ibsen M, Quong S, Greisel M, McGuire T, Potzel P, SAE Int. J. Altern. Powertrains, 3, 2, 2014
  2. Olmos F, Manousiouthakis VI, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 38, 8, 2013
  3. Handa K, Yamaguchi S, Minowa K, Mathison S, SAE Int. J. Altern. Powertrains, 6, 2, 2017
  4. Pregassame S, Barth F, Allidieres L, Barral K, 16th World Hydrog. Energy Conf. (2006).
  5. Society of Automotive Engineers. SAE J2601: Fueling Protocols for Light Duty Gaseous Hydrogen Surface Vehicles. SAE International (2016).
  6. Mathison S, How Advanced Hydrogen Fueling Protocols can Improve Fueling Performance & H2 Station Design (2020).
  7. Mathison S, Handa K, McGuire T, Brown T, Goldstein T, Johnston M, SAE Int. J. Altern. Powertrains, 4, 1, 2015
  8. Harty R, Mathison S, Gupta N, Proc. Natl. Hydrog. Assoc. Conf. (2010).
  9. Chae CK, Park BH, Huh YS, Kang SK, Kang SY, Kim HN, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 45, 30, 2020
  10. Thomas B, Frederic B, Thomas B, Baptiste R, Clemence D, D5.1 Validation of a new approach for fast filling of hydrogen tanks, HyTransfer (2017).
  11. Handa K, Yamaguchi S, Int. J. Automot. Eng., 9, 4, 2018
  12. Yamaguchi S, Fujita Y, Handa K, 31st Int. Electr. Veh. Symp. Exhib. EVS (2018).
  13. Rothuizen ED, Hydrogen fuelling stations: A thermodynamic analysis of fuelling hydrogen vehicles for personal transportation, Ph.D. Thesis. Technical University of Denmark (2013).
  14. Monde M, Mitsutake Y, Woodfield PLl, Maruyama S, Heat Transf. Eng., 36, 1, 2007
  15. Lemmon EW, Huber ML, Leachman JW, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 113, 6, 2008
  16. Çengel YA, Boles MA, Kanoglu M, Thermodynamics: An engineering approach, McGraw-Hill Education (2018).
  17. Çengel YA, Cimbala JM, Fluid mechanics: Fundamentals and applications, 4th ed. McGraw-Hill Education (2018).
  18. Molkov V, Dadashzadeh M, Makarov D, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44, 8, 2019
  19. The International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 19880- 1 (2016): Gaseous hydrogen - Fuelling - Part 1: General requirements. (2016).
  20. Ahn J, Noh Y, Joung T, Lim Y, Kim J, Seo Y, Chang D, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44, 5, 2019