Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.12, 3422-3433, 2022
Liquid-liquid equilibrium (LLE) data of ternary mixtures of [water+acetic acid+1-nonanol] and [water+acetic acid+1-decanol] at 298.2-318.2 K and 101.3 kPa
The addition of alcohols to acetic acid and water mixture is effective for extracting acetic acid from the mixture. This work presents the liquid-liquid phase equilibrium (LLE) data of the ternary systems of 1-nonanol/acetic acid/water and 1-decanol/acetic acid/water measured at 298.2, 303.2, 308.2, and 318.2 K at 101.3 kPa. The effectiveness of the extraction process was quantified by the distribution coefficient (D) and selectivity (S). It was found that the extraction capability of 1-nonanol was superior to that of 1-decanol. We also used the Hand plot and the Othmer–Tobias plot to assess the reliability of the experimental LLE data, and the linear coefficient was greater than 0.99. The non-random two-liquid (NRTL) and the universal quasichemical (UNIQUAC) model were also used to correlate the experimental data. The Gibbs energy minimization method was used to evaluate the reliability of the regression parameters of the statistical model. The calculated root mean square deviation (RMSD) values were less than 0.023, indicating that both models were adequate for these systems.
[References]
  1. Acetic Acid Market: Global Industry Trends, Share, Size, Growth, Opportunity and Forecast 2021-2026, IMARC Services Private Limited., 109 (2021).
  2. Jie Y, Shu-Ming L, Chun-Hong G, Zhan-Ping Y, Fine Chem. Ind. Raw. Mater. Intermed., 04, 11, 2010
  3. Chistodoulou X, Sharon B, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 11234, 2016
  4. Abubaker HN, Veiga MC, Kennes C, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 12, 1029, 2015
  5. Sim JH, Kamaruddin AH, Long WS, Biochem. Eng. J., 40, 337, 2008
  6. Zhang H, Ge Z, Guo X, Bai P, Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog., 34, 1768, 2015
  7. Chien IL, Zeng KL, Chao HY, Liu JH, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59, 4547, 2004
  8. Garcia-Chavez LY, Schuur B, De Haan AB, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 4902, 2013
  9. Cebreiros F, Guigou MD, Cabrera MN, Ind. Crop. Prod., 109, 101, 2017
  10. IJmker HM, Gramblićka M, Kersten SRA , van der Ham AGJ, Schuur B, Sep. Purif. Technol., 125, 256, 2014
  11. Fahim MA, Qader A, Hughes MA, Sep. Purif. Technol., 27, 1809, 1992
  12. Qi GS, Liu YZ, Jiao WZ, Mod. Chem. Ind., 11, 65, 2008
  13. Fahim MA, Al-Muhtaseb SA, Al-Nashef IM, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 42, 183, 1997
  14. Tan TC, Aravinth S, Fluid Phase Equilib., 163, 243, 1999
  15. Al-Muhtaseb SA, Fahim MA, Fluid Phase Equilib., 123, 189, 1996
  16. Esquível MM, Bernardo-Gil MG, Fluid Phase Equilib., 57, 307, 1990
  17. Aljimaz AS, Fandary MSH, Alkandary JA, Fahim MA, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 45, 301, 2000
  18. Jia K, Zhing T, Feng L, Zhang C, Xu X, J. Chem. Thermodyn., 153, 106305, 2021
  19. Feng L, Zhang W, Ge M, Yi Y, J. Chem. Eng. Data,, 65, 1531, 2020
  20. Ebrahimkhani MJ, Azadian M, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 67, 404, 2022
  21. Jeong AY, Cho JA, Kim Y, Cho HK, Choi KY, Lim JS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35, 1328, 2018
  22. Yim JH, Park KW, Lim JS, Choi KY, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 64, 3882, 2019
  23. Taylor BN, Kuyatt CE, NIST Technical Note 1297 1994 Edition, Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results, Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol., 1 (1994).
  24. Othmer D, Tobias P, Ind. Eng. Chem., 34, 693, 1942
  25. Hand DB, J. Phys. Chem., 34, 1961, 1930
  26. Renon H, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 4, 135, 1968
  27. Abrams DS, Prausnitz JM, AIChE J., 21, 116, 1975
  28. Marcilla A, Reyes-Labarta JA, Olaya MM, Fluid Phase Equilib., 433, 243, 2017
  29. Reyes-Labarta, J. A. Graphical User Interface (GUI) for the Representation of GM Surfaces (Using the NRTL Model) and Curves, Including Tie-Lines and Hessian Matrix. Universidad de Alicante (2015).