Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.11, 3129-3137, 2022
Assessment of MOF-801 synthesis for toluene adsorption by using design of experiment methodology
A sequential design of experiments was used to optimize the MOF-801 synthesis process for toluene adsorption. First, mixture design was employed on optimizing precursor concentration. Three chemical materials, fumaric acid, N,N-dimethylformamide and formic acid, were selected to optimize their composition using extreme vertices design methods. By analysis of variance (ANOVA), the model was expected to be acceptable for statistical prediction. The optimal precursor composition for the synthesis of MOF-801 was predicted on a molar basis as fallows: ZrOCl2·8H2O: fumaric acid : dimethylformamide : formic acid=1.0 : 1.7 : 43.3 : 39.5. Thereafter, 23 factorial design was selected to investigate the effect of synthesis reaction conditions such as temperature, time and stirring speed. By the statistical analysis of eight adsorption runs, stirring speed could be excluded in further investigation. Central composite design with synthesis time and temperature was performed to optimize the synthesis process. The results were estimated using the quadratic model equation derived through nine synthesis experiments. Using this model, it was predicted that MOF-801 prepared under the synthesis time and temperature of 158 ℃ and 12 h, respectively, had the maximum amount of toluene adsorption. Indeed, after synthesizing MOF-801 with the optimized synthesis conditions, an actual adsorption capacity of the samples was 151.9mg/g, close to the predicted value of 95.5%.
[References]
  1. Wu W, Zhao B, Wang S, Hao J, J. Environ. Sci., 53, 224, 2017
  2. Lu Y, Liu J, Lu B, Jiang A, Wan C, J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 204, 2010
  3. Ma L, He M, Fu P, Jiang X, Lv W, Huang Y, Liu Y, Wang H, Sep. Purif. Technol., 235, 116146, 2020
  4. Li X, Zhang L, Yang Z, Wang P, Yan Y, Ran J, Sep. Purif. Technol., 235, 116213, 2020
  5. Biard PF, Couvert A, Giraudet S, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 59, 70, 2018
  6. Wu W, Zhao B, Wang S, Hao J, J. Environ. Sci., 53, 224, 2017
  7. Vellingiri K, Kumar P, Deep A, Kim KH, Chem. Eng. J., 307, 1116, 2017
  8. Vo TK, Le VN, Yoo KS, Song M, Kim D, Kim J, Cryst. Growth Des., 19, 4949, 2019
  9. Liu H, Yu Y, Shao Q, Long C, Sep. Purif. Technol., 228, 115755, 2019
  10. Yang P, Song M, Kim D, Jung SP, Hwang Y, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36, 1806, 2019
  11. Lillo-Ródenas MA, Cazorla-Amorós D, Linares-Solano A, Carbon, 43, 1758, 2005
  12. Mirth G, Lercher JA, J. Phys. Chem., 95, 3736, 1991
  13. Kubo S, Kosuge K, Langmuir, 23, 11761, 2007
  14. Van der Perre S, Van Assche T, Bozbiyik B, Lannoeye J, De Vos DE, Baron GV, Denayer JFM, Langmuir, 30, 8416, 2014
  15. Huang CY, Song M, Gu ZY, Wang HF, Yan XP, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 4490, 2011
  16. Vo TK, Kim JH, Kwon HT, Kim J, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 80, 345, 2019
  17. Lahoz-Martín FD, Martín-Calvo A, Calero S, J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 13126, 2014
  18. Lee DW, Didriksen T, Olsbye U, Blom R, Grande CA, Sep. Purif. Technol., 235, 116182, 2020
  19. Tranchemontagne DJ, Mendoza-Cortes JL, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi OM, Chem. Soc. Rev., 38, 1257, 2009
  20. Bai Y, Dou Y, Xie LH, Rutledge W, Li JR, Zhou HC, Chem. Soc. Rev., 45, 2327, 2016
  21. Wißmann G, Schaate A, Lilienthal S, Bremer I, Schneider AM, Behrens P, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 152, 64, 2012
  22. Zahn G, Schulze HA, Lippke J, König S, Sazama U, Fröba M, Behrens P, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 203, 186, 2015
  23. Furukawa H, Gandara F, Zhang YB, Jiang J, Queen WL, Hudson MR, Yaghi OM, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136, 4369, 2014