Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.39, No.8, 2055-2068, 2022
The effects of under-ribs convection on enhanced drainage parallel flow field for proton exchange membrane fuel cell
A new enhanced drainage parallel (EDP) flow field was designed that not only enhances under-rib convection but also enables a more uniform distribution of hydrogen and oxygen. Through the optimization of the model, we established the influence of the flow field size, relative humidity, and stoichiometric ratio on cell performance. When the rib width is reduced, the maximum power density is improved. Compared with the parallel flow field and serpentine flow field, the maximum power density of the EDP flow field was increased by 69.4% and 7.9%, respectively. Under optimal conditions, the net power of the EDP flow field can reach 0.56 W/cm2. In the single-cell test, the maximum power density of the EDP flow field can reach 1.19 W/cm2. This implies that the EDP flow field has potential application of proton exchange membrane fuel cells.
[References]
Yi P, Zhang D, Qiu D, Peng L, Lai X, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 44 , 6813, 2019
Zhu W, Fang JA, Zhang W, Xu Y, Tong L, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 39 , 2869, 2014
Kahraman H, Cevik I, Dündar F, Ficic F, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 41 , 1961, 2016
Idibie CA, Abdulkareem SA, Pienaar C, Iyuke SE, Vandyk L, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. , 49 , 1600, 2010
Amadane Y, Mounir H, Marjani AE, Bouhrim H, Rafi MA, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 45 (9), 7587, 2020
Abdulla S, Patnaikuni VS, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 45 , 25970, 2020
Pefeer MF, Cora ON, Kog M, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 36 , 15427, 2011
Randrianarizafy B, Schott P, Chandesris M, Gerard M, Bultel Y, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 43 , 8907, 2018
El-Dosoky M, Ahmed M, Ashgriz N, Int. J. Energy Res. , 42 , 1664, 2018
Khazaee I, Ghazikhani M, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 38 , 2521, 2013
Lim BH, Majlan EH, Daud WRW, Husaini T, Rosli MI, Ionics , 22 , 1, 2016
Khazaee I, Ghazikhani M, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 38 , 1551, 2013
Gerteisen D, Heilmann T, Ziegler C, J. Power Sources , 187 , 165, 2009
Xuan L, Hang G, Fang Y, Chong FM, Electrochim. Acta , 52 , 3607, 2007
Prasad K, Jayanti S, J. Power Sources , 180 , 227, 2008
Arvay A, French J, Wang JC, Peng XH, Kannan AM, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 38 , 3717, 2013
Khazaee I, Ghazikhani M, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 37 , 2297, 2012
Dong J, Liu S, Liu S, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy , 12 , 044303, 2020
Kahraman H, Coban A, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 45 , 5143, 2020
Yan X, Guan C, Zhang Y, Jiang K, Wei G, Cheng X, Shen S, Zhang J, Appl. Therm. Eng. , 147 , 1107, 2019
Yoshida T, Kojima K, Electrochem. Soc. Interface , 24 , 45, 2015
Heidary H, Kermani MJ, Dabir B, Energy Conv. Manag. , 124 , 51, 2016
Perng SW, Wu HW, Appl. Energy , 143 , 81, 2015
Velisala V, Pullagura G, Yarramsetty N, Vadapalli S, Gorantla KK, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 46 (12), 11687, 2021
Liu HC, Yang WM, Cheng LS, Tan J, Fuel Cells , 18 , 173, 2017
Shi Z, Xia W, J. Power Sources , 185 , 985, 2008
Hang G, Yue PC, Yan QX, Fang Y, Chong FM, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 38 , 11028, 2013
Abdulla S, Seepana MM, Patnaikuni VS, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 45 , 7691, 2020
Tiss F, Chouikh R, Guizani A, Energy Conv. Manag. , 80 , 32, 2014
Baz FB, Ookawara S, Ahmed M, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 44 , 30644, 2018
Shimpalee S, Zee J, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 32 , 842, 2007
Chowdhury MZ, Genc O, Toros S, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 43 , 10798, 2018
Velisala V, Srinivasulu GN, Arabian J. Sci. Eng. , 43 , 1225, 2018
Abdulla S, Patnaikuni VS, Int. J. Energy Res. , 43 , 2806, 2019
Barbir F, Boston A, London H, York N, Tokyo S, Elsevier Academic Press (2005).
Li W, Zhang Q, Wang C, Yan X, Shen S, Xia G, Zhu F, Zhang J, Appl. Energy , 195 , 278, 2017
Celik E, Karagoz I, J. Power Energy , 234 , 1189, 2020
Liu R, Zhou W, Li S, Li F, Ling W, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy , 45 , 17833, 2020
Liang H, Ming HA, Yga B, Dfa B, Pwa B, Bo L, Zs A, Energy Conv. Manag. , 205 , 112335, 2020
이전 논문 다음 논문
Result Search