Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.9, 2548-2554, 2022
Ultra-thin polymer-encapsulation of SrAl2O4 : Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor for enhanced hydrolytic resistance
Eu2+ and Dy3+ doped strontium aluminates (SrAl2O4 : Eu2+, Dy3+) are well known green light emitting materials with a long-lasting afterglow property; however, SrAl2O4 : Eu2+ , Dy3+ is readily hydrolized under ambient moisture conditions, which impedes industrial applications. In this work, SrAl2O4 : Eu2+, Dy3+ phosphor was encapsulated by layer-by-layer (LbL) and coacervation methods for the formation of ultra-thin polymeric capsulation layer. Morphology of the phosphor and polymer-encapsulated phosphors was characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The amount and thickness of the encapsulated polymer layers were analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), and the polymer content for the phosphor encapsulated by LbL was estimated to be 0.08 wt% with a shell thickness of 11 nm. After pristine phosphor and encapsulated phosphor samples were immersed in water for 24 h, the photoluminescence (PL) intensity was measured to compare the water-resistant performance. The polymer-encapsulated phosphors by LbL and coacervation methods were maintained for 85.7 and 93.5% of pristine phosphors, respectively, while PL intensity of the pristine phosphor was observed as 18.1% after immersion in water for 24 h. The change in pH was monitored under the same conditions. The pH for the dispersion of polymer-encapsulated phosphors by LbL and coacervation methods was measured as 10.27 and 9.63, respectively, while pH for the dispersion of the pristine phosphor was observed as 11.99. This research may provide a wider option for the encapsulation methods of particulate materials for applications where encapsulation with very thin layer of polymer is needed, because the encapsulation process inevitably lowers both the content of active ingredients and consequently their performance as well.
[References]
  1. Rojas-Hernandez RE, Rubio-Marcos F, Rodriguez MA, Fernandez JF, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 81, 2759, 2018
  2. Yamamoto H, Matsuzawa T, J. Lumines., 72-74, 287, 1997
  3. Zeng P, Wei X, Yin M, Chen Y, J. Lumines., 199, 400, 2018
  4. Nance J, Sparks TD, Prog. Org. Coat., 144, 105637, 2020
  5. Park JI, Jeong SH, Cheong IW, J. Adhes. Interface, 17, 110, 2016
  6. Bi Y, Pei J, Chen Z, Zhang L, Li R, Hu D, Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol., 14, 252, 2021
  7. Nance J, Sparks TD, Prog. Org. Coat., 148, 105749, 2020
  8. Lu X, Mater. Chem. Phys., 93, 526, 2005
  9. Zhu Y, Zheng M, Zeng J, Xiao Y, Liu Y, Mater. Chem. Phys., 113, 721, 2009
  10. Luitel HN, Watari T, Torikai T, Yada M, Chand R, Xu CN, Nanoka K, Appl. Surf. Sci., 256, 2347, 2010
  11. Imal Y, Momoda R, Adachi Y, Nishikubo K, Kaida Y, Yamada H, Xu CN, J. Electrochem. Soc., 154, J77, 2007
  12. Tayebi M, Movahed SO, Ahmadpour A, RSC Adv., 9, 38703, 2019
  13. Yan J, Tang Z, Luo S, Zhang Z, Key Eng. Mater., 280-283, 509, 2005
  14. Guo C, Chu B, Su Q, Appl. Surf. Sci., 225, 198, 2004
  15. Lu X, Zhong M, Shu W, Yu Q, Xiong X, Wang R, Powder Technol., 177, 83, 2007
  16. Wang H, Liang X, Liu K, Zhou Q, Wang J, Chen P, He B, Li J, Key Eng. Mater., 680, 224, 2016
  17. Khursheed S, Sheergojri GA, Sharma J, Mater. Today Proc., 21, 2096, 2020
  18. He Q, Hu C, Opt. Mater., 38, 286, 2014
  19. Shi M, Lu B, Jin Y, Ge M, J. Mater. Sci. -Mater. Med., 32, 20804, 2021
  20. Wu Y, Gan J, Wu X, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 13, 1230, 2021
  21. Lyu L, Chen Y, Yu L, Zhang L, Pei J, Materials, 13, 426, 2020
  22. Frisch HL, J. Phys. Chem., 61, 93, 1957
  23. Ahn JH, Jeong YS, Kim IT, Jeon SH, Park CH, Sensors, 19, 1416, 2019
  24. Hajar HM, Suriani MJ, Sabri MGM, Ghazali MJ, Nik WBW, Biosci. Biotechnol. Res. Asia, 12, 71, 2015