About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
  Guidelines for Publication
  Ethics
Articles & Issues
  Search
  Issue
  Online First
  KJChE on
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethical Responsibilities of
  Authors in KJChE
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.4, 963-972, 2022
Influence of degree of compaction on electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soil
Yin C, Jiang L, Sun K, Sun W, Liang B
In order to evaluate the electrokinetic process for unsaturated soil with different compacted conditions, six remolded soil samples containing the same water content (16 wt%) were compressed to obtain the various degrees of compaction (96.87% to 103.37%). All the lab-scale experiments were performed by applying a constant electrical voltage (1 V/cm). The electrical parameters related to the electrokinetic process were monitored to evaluate the influence of the soil degree of compaction on this process. The obtained results indicate that the soil compaction degree could influence the electrical current, the migration velocity of the voltage front, and the controlling mechanism of water transport during the electrokinetic processes. Followed by the initial decline, the electrical current of soil with a lower degree of compaction (96.87%) would increase at 0.7mA/h, which was about seven times larger than that of the soil with a higher degree of compaction (103.37%). The migration velocity of voltage front in the soils increased with decreasing compaction degree. The voltage front migrated from the cathode towards the anode at 6.66 mm/h in the soil with a lower degree of compaction (96.87%). In comparison, the migration velocity decreased to 1.75 mm/h in the soil with a higher degree of compaction (103.37%). Both hydraulic and electrokinetic driving forces could influence the water transport in unsaturated soil. The results demonstrate that the catholyte entering the soil under the hydraulic gradient could be opposite to electro-osmosis. The electrokinetic driving force would be a major controlling mechanism for the unsaturated soil with a higher degree of compaction. For the soil with a lower degree of compaction, the hydraulic driving force would affect the water transport in the soil during its initial saturation period. Moreover, with the increase in soil saturation, the effects of hydraulic driving force were weakened, and the electrochemical properties of the pore solution appeared to be the dominant factor for the electrokinetic process.
Keywords: Electrokinetic Remediation; Unsaturated Soil; Degree of Compaction; Apparent Electrical Conductivity
[References]
  1. Reddy KR, Saichek RE, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 129, 336, 2003
  2. Sivapullaiah PV, Prakash BSN, J. Hazard. Mater., 143, 682, 2007
  3. Ryu BG, Park SW, Baek K, Yang JS, Sep. Sci. Technol., 44, 2421, 2009
  4. Reddy KR, Cameselle C, Ala P, J. Appl. Electrochem., 40, 1269, 2010
  5. Tamagnini C, Jommi C, Cattaneo F, An. Acad Bras Cienc., 82, 169, 2010
  6. Razaee M, Asadollahfardi G, Environ. Model. Assess., 24, 235, 2019
  7. Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker R, J. Hazard. Mater., 40, 117, 1995
  8. Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM, J. Hazard. Mater., 55, 221, 1997
  9. Yeung AT, Hsu C, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 131, 298, 2005
  10. Gill T, Harbottle MJ, Smith JWN, Thornton SF, Chemosphere, 107, 31, 2014
  11. Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Risco C, Isidro J, Rodrigo S, Saez C, Pañizares P, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA, Chemosphere, 166, 540, 2017
  12. Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Risco C, Isidro J, Rodrigo S, Saez C, Pañizares P, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA, Chemosphere, 166, 549, 2017
  13. Vocciante M, Caretta A, Bua L, Bagatin R, Ferro S, Chem. Eng. J., 289, 123, 2016
  14. Liu Y, Zheng L, Rao S, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 6642785, 2021
  15. Li X, Wang L, Sun X, Cong Y, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 13, 1463, 2019
  16. Cox CD, Shoesmith MA, Ghosh MM, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 1933, 1996
  17. Saini A, Bekele DN, Chadalavada S, Fang C, Naidu R, Environ. Technol. Inno., 23, 101585, 2021
  18. Lu Q, Chemosphere, 254, 126861, 2020
  19. Ghobadi R, Altaee A, Zhou JL, Karbassiyazdi E, Ganbat N, Sci. Total Environ., 794, 148668, 2021
  20. Sun R, Gong W, Chen Y, Hong J, Wang Y, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 153, 117, 2021
  21. ASTM D4186/D4186M-20e1 (2020). Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Saturated Cohesive Soils Using Controlled-Strain Loading. ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA.
  22. ASTM D698-12 (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction of Soil Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/ m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  23. ASTM D1557-12 (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700kN-m/m3)), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  24. Kowalczyk S, Maślakowski M, Tucholka P, J. Appl. Geophys, 110, 43, 2014
  25. Lipiec J, Hajnos M, Świeboda R, Geoderma, 179-180, 20, 2012
  26. Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 2638, 1993
  27. Tang K, Zhang F, Feng D, Lu X, Eng. Geol., 294, 106404, 2021
  28. Yustres A, Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Cabrera V, Navarro V, E3S Web of Conferences, 195, 02003 (2020).
  29. Mattson ED, Bowman RS, Lindgren ER, J. Contam. Hydrol., 54, 99, 2002
  30. Yustres A, López-Vizcaíno R, Sáez C, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA, Navarro V, Sep. Purif. Technol., 192, 196, 2018
  31. Xie XY, Liu YM, Zheng LW, 2018. Mar. Georesour. Geotec., 37, 1188, 2019
  32. ASTM D4318-17e1 (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  33. ASTM D854-14 (2014). Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  34. ASTM D7503-18 (2018). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  35. Huweg AF, Ph.D Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland (2013).
  36. ASTM G57-06 (2012). Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Soil Resistivity Using the Wenner Four-Electrode Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  37. Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 122, 666, 1996
  38. Al-Hamdan AZ, Reddy KR, Chemosphere, 71, 860, 2008
  39. Hsu C, Yeung AT, Menon RM, Environ. Syst. Decis., 31, 33, 2011
  40. Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S, Waste Manage., 19, 269, 1999
  41. Reddy KR, Darko-Kagya K, Al-Hamdan AZ, Water Air Soil Pollut., 221, 35, 2011
  42. Roodposhti HR, Hafizi MK, Kermani MRS, Nik MRG, J. Appl. Geophys., 168, 49, 2019
  43. Gabrieli L, Jommi C, Musso G, Romero E, J. Appl. Electrochem., 38, 1043, 2008
  44. Shin SY, Park SM, Baek K, Water Air Soil Pollut., 227, 223, 2016
  45. Sauer MC, Southwick PE, Spiegler KS, Wylie MRJ, Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 2187, 1955
  46. Rhoades JD, Manteghi NA, Shouse PJ, Alves WJ, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 433, 1989
  47. Reddy KR, Maturi K, In 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan, Millpress Science Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2429-2432 (2005).
  48. Friedman SP, Comput. Electron. Agric., 46, 45, 2005
  49. Samouëlian A, Cousin I, Tabbagh A, Bruand A, Richard G, Soil Till. Res., 83, 173, 2005
  50. Niwas S, Tezkan B, Israil M, Hydrogeol. J., 19, 307, 2011
  51. Archie GE, Transactions of the AIME, 146, 54, 1942
  52. Friedman SP, Comput. Electron. Agr., 46, 45, 2005
  53. Shackelford CD, Daniel DE, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 117, 467, 1991
  54. Alshawabkeh AN, Acar YB, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A-Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 27, 1835, 1992
  55. Wieczorek S, Weigand H, Schmid M, Marb C, Eng. Geol., 77, 203, 2005
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.