Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.6, 1460-1471, 2022
Reaction mechanism and kinetic modeling of olefin conversion over phosphorus modified ZSM-5 catalyst
Reaction pathways and kinetics of C2-C6 olefins cracking over ZSM-5 catalyst were investigated based on product distribution to develop a model. Experimental tests of the catalytic cracking of olefins were performed in the temperature range of 450-650℃, space-time of 0.375-3.5min, and partial pressure of 0.08-0.23 atm. For each feed, a possible reaction pathway was identified and used for the model. Based on the identified reactions a lumped kinetic model was developed using the power-law method. The developed model included direct olefin cracking, oligomerization, and re-cracking of oligomers. Thirteen reversible reactions were considered as major reactions to represent this complex system. For each forward and backward reaction step, apparent activation energy and pre-exponential factors were estimated. The model predicts the experimental product components with an R2 value of 0.8735-0.9718. Comparison of experimental result with the developed model showed the developed model predicted the feed product distribution with accuracy. Sensitivity analysis was done to identify dominant reaction paths for each feed that affected the yield of ethylene and propylene, the main products that needed to be maximized during industrial catalytic cracking.
[References]
  1. Sadrameli S, Fuel, 173, 285, 2016
  2. Sadrameli S, Fuel, 140, 102, 2015
  3. Standl S, Hinrichsen O, Catalysts, 8, 626, 2018
  4. Warnecke F, Lin L, Haag SP, Freund HR, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 59, 12696, 2020
  5. Standl S, Kuhlewind T, Tonigold M, Hinrichsen O, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 18107, 2019
  6. Guo YH, Pu M, Chen BH, Cao F, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 455, 65, 2013
  7. Krannila H, Haag W, Gates B, J. Catal., 135, 115, 1992
  8. Narbeshuber TF, Vinek H, Lercher JA, J. Catal., 157, 388, 1995
  9. Coelho A, Caeiro G, Lemos M, Lemos F, Ribeiro FR, Fuel, 111, 449, 2013
  10. Epelde E, Aguayo AST, Olazar M, Bilbao J, Gayubo AG, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53, 10599, 2014
  11. Epelde E, Gayubo AG, Olazar M, Bilbao J, Aguayo AT, Chem. Eng. J., 251, 80, 2014
  12. Chen CJ, Rangarajan S, Hill IM, Bhan A, Acs Catal., 4, 2319, 2014
  13. Liu D, Choi WC, Kang NY, Lee YJ, Park HS, Shin CH, Park YK, Catal. Today, 226, 52, 2014
  14. Lukyanov DB, Gnep NS, Guisnet MR, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 33, 223, 1994
  15. Tabak S, Krambeck F, Garwood W, AIChE J., 32, 1526, 1986
  16. Lee JH, Kang S, Kim Y, Park S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 4264, 2011
  17. Abbot J, Wojciechowski B, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 63, 462, 1985
  18. Buchanan J, Santiesteban J, Haag W, J. Catal., 158, 279, 1996
  19. Huang X, Aihemaitijiang D, Xiao WD, Chem. Eng. J., 280, 222, 2015
  20. Voge H, Good G, Greensfelder B, Ind. Eng. Chem., 38, 1033, 1946
  21. Ying L, Zhu J, Cheng Y, Wang L, Li X, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 33, 80, 2016
  22. Li J, Li T, Ma H, Sun Q, Li C, Ying W, Fang D, Chem. Eng. J., 346, 397, 2018
  23. Guisnet M, Gnep N, Aittaleb D, Doyemet Y, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 87, 255, 1992
  24. Borges P, Pinto RR, Lemos M, Lemos F, Védrine J, Derouane E, Ribeiro FR, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 324, 20, 2007
  25. Song Y, Zhu X, Xu L, Catal. Commun., 7, 218, 2006