Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.5, 1240-1247, 2022
Catalytic pyrolysis of corn straw for deoxygenation of bio-oil with different types of catalysts
Corn straw can be converted to bio-oil through pyrolysis. However, the application of bio-oil is severely restricted due to the high content of oxygen. Catalytic pyrolysis is an available way for deoxygenation of bio-oil, and the deoxygenation reactions are strongly dependent on the type of catalyst. Whereas, the correlation between the deoxygenated products and the catalyst types is still far from clear. In this work, the migration of O in the pyrolysis process was investigated, and eight catalysts were screened for deoxygenation of bio-oil, with a lab-scale fixed-bed reactor. The results showed that with the increase of pyrolysis temperature, the content of O in bio-oil decreased below 400 ℃ and then became stable and finally increased rapidly after 550 ℃, indicating that the range of 400-550 ℃ was the proper temperature for deoxygenation. Eight catalysts (ZSM-5, SAPO-34, ZnO, MgO, δ-Al2O3, γ-Al2O3, acidified-α-Al2O3 and acidified-γ-Al2O3) were tested, and it was found that a higher alkalinity of catalyst was favorable for decarboxylation of bio-oil with more produced CO2, while a higher acidity was promoted the decrease of alcohols and carbonyls with more generation of H2O and/or CO. MgO was judged as the optimal catalyst for deoxygenation of bio-oil. The quality of bio-oil under the catalysis of MgO was best, with higher H/C and lower O/C.
[References]
  1. Lee H, Kim YM, Lee IG, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 3299, 2016
  2. Chen X, Chen Y, Yang H, Wang X, Che Q, Chen W, Chen H, Bioresour. Technol., 273, 153, 2019
  3. Tian X, Wang Y, Zeng Z, Dai L, Peng Y, Jiang L, Yang X, Yue L, Liu Y, Ruan R, Bioresour. Technol., 320, 124415, 2021
  4. Wang C, Li L, Zeng Z, Xu X, Ma X, Chen R, Su C, Bioresour. Technol., 281, 412, 2019
  5. Eschenbacher A, Saraeian A, Jensen PA, Shanks BH, Li C, Duus JO, Smitshuysen TEL, Damsgaard CD, Hansen AB, Chem. Eng. J., 394, 124878, 2020
  6. Oliveira JLF, Batista LM, dos Santos NA, Araújo AM, Fernandes VJ Jr, Araujo AS, Alves AP, Gondim AD, Renew. Energy, 168, 1377, 2021
  7. Lin Y, Zhang C, Zhang M, Zhang J, Energy Fuels, 24(10), 5686, 2010
  8. Santamaria L, Artetxe M, Lopez G, Cortazar M, Amutio M, Bilbao J, Olazar M, Fuel. Process. Technol., 198, 106223, 2020
  9. Lup ANK, Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Aroua MK, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 541, 87, 2017
  10. Veses A, Puértolas B, López JM, Callén MS, Solsona B, García T, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 4(3), 1653, 2016
  11. Liu SN, Cao JP, Zhao XY, Wang JX, Ren XY, Yuan ZS, Guo ZX, Shen WZ, Bai J, Wei XY, J. Energy Inst., 92(5), 1567, 2019
  12. Eschenbacher A, Jensen PA, Henriksen UB, Ahrenfeldt J, Li C, Duus JO, Mentzel UV, Jensen AD, Energy Fuels, 33(7), 6405, 2019
  13. Chaihad N, Anniwaer A, Karnjanakom S, Kasai Y, Kongparakul S, Samart C, Reubroycharoen P, Abudula A, Guan G, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 155, 105079, 2021
  14. Puertolas B, Keller TC, Mitchell S, Pérez-Ramírez J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 184, 77, 2016
  15. Wang H, Tian W, Zeng F, Du H, Zhang J, Li X, Fuel, 282, 118807, 2020
  16. Kim YM, Lee HW, Jang SH, Jeong J, Ryu S, Jung SC, Park YK, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37(3), 493, 2020
  17. Zhou Q, Zarei A, De Girolamo A, Yan Y, Zhang L, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 139, 167, 2019
  18. Qian Y, Zhang J, Wang J, Bioresour. Technol., 174, 95, 2014