Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.39, No.5, 1182-1193, 2022
Development of 3D CFD model of compact steam methane reforming process for standalone applications
The demand for sustainable energy has increased with growing concerns of environmental damage. H2 has attracted considerable attention as a clean and renewable energy carrier that can be used in fuel cells. Industrial H2 has been manufactured to produce synthetic gas in large-capacity plants using steam methane reforming (SMR). However, a compact H2 production system is needed that maintains production efficiency on a small scale for fuel cell applications. In this study, a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics model of a compact steam reforming reactor was developed based on the experimental data measured in a pilot-scale charging station. Using the developed model, one can predict all the compositions of the reformate produced in the reactor and simultaneously analyze the temperatures of the product, flue gas, and the reaction tube. Therewith, case studies were conducted to compare the H2 production performance of the eight different structures and sizes of the proposed reformer. Based on the results, a design improvement strategy is proposed for an efficient small-scale SMR process.
[References]
  1. ENERGY EER, (Hydrogen Production: Natural Gas Reforming).
  2. Demirbas A, Energy Sources B: Econ. Plan. Policy, 12, 172, 2017
  3. Gupta RB, Hydrogen fuel - production, transport and storage, CRC Press (2009).
  4. Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 67, 597, 2017
  5. Simpson AP, Lutz AE, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 32, 4811, 2007
  6. Hajjaji N, Pons MN, Houas A, Renaudin V, Energy Policy, 42, 392, 2012
  7. Li P, Chen L, Xia S, Zhang L, Int. J. Chem. React., 17, 20180191, 2019
  8. Taji M, Farsi M, Keshavarz P, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 43, 13110, 2018
  9. Nobandegani MS, Birjandi MRS, Darbandi T, Khalilipour MM, Shahraki F, Mohebbi-Kalhori D, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 36, 540, 2016
  10. Kallegoda CM, CH 4034 Comprehensive Design Project II Interim Report 1 Primary Reformer Design Production of Ammonia from Naphtha, D. P. G. Rathnasiri (2017).
  11. Tran A, Aguirre A, Crose M, Durand H, Christofides PD, Comput. Chem. Eng., 104, 185, 2017
  12. Kumar A, Edgar TF, Baldea M, Comput. Chem. Eng., 107, 271, 2017
  13. Kumar A, Baldea M, Edgar TF, Comput. Chem. Eng., 105, 224, 2017
  14. Kumar A, Baldea M, Edgar TF, Control Eng. Practice, 54, 140, 2016
  15. Chen P, Du W, Zhang M, Duan F, Zhang L, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44, 15704, 2019
  16. Bhutta MMA, Hayat N, Bashir MH, Khan AR, Ahmad KN, Khan S, Appl. Therm. Eng., 32, 1, 2012
  17. Khan MJH, Hussain MA, Mansourpour Z, Mostoufi N, Ghasem NM, Abdullah EC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20, 3919, 2014
  18. Uebel K, Rößger P, Prüfert U, Richter A, Meyer B, Fuel Process. Technol., 149, 290, 2016
  19. Bao Z, Yang F, Wu Z, Nyamsi SN, Zhang Z, Energy Conv. Manag., 65, 322, 2013
  20. Ding J, Wang X, Zhou XF, Ren NQ, Guo WQ, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 7016, 2010
  21. Ansoni JL, Seleghim P, Adv. Eng. Softw., 91, 23, 2016
  22. Park S, Na J, Kim M, Lee JM, Comput. Chem. Eng., 119, 25, 2018
  23. Shin G, Yun J, Yu S, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 42, 14697, 2017
  24. Hong SK, Dong SK, Han JO, Lee JS, Lee YC, Energy, 61, 410, 2013
  25. Nguyen DD, Ngo SI, Lim YI, Kim W, Lee UD, Seo D, Yoon WL, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 44, 1973, 2019
  26. Ngo SI, Lim YI, Kim W, Seo DJ, Yoon WL, Appl. Energy, 236, 340, 2019
  27. Xu J, Froment GF, AICHE Symp. Ser., 35, 88, 1989
  28. Han J, A Development of Engine and Fuelling Station for HCNG fueled City Bus (2016).
  29. Yu Z, Cao E, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Dai Z, Fuel Process. Technol., 87, 695, 2006
  30. Hoi PCJ, Validation of discrete ordinate radiation model for application in UV air disinfection modeling (2014).
  31. Tran A, Aguirre A, Durand H, Crose M, Christofides PD, Chem. Eng. Sci., 171, 576, 2017