Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.10, 2047-2056, 2021
Kinetic modeling of methanol to olefins over phosphorus modified HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst
A lumped kinetic model has been developed for the methanol to olefins (MTO) reaction over phosphorus modified HZSM-5 catalyst. In consideration of mixed feed cracking, a higher reaction temperature than the conventional MTO reaction was chosen. The reaction temperature considered is in range of 500 to 680 °C. The experimental data for the kinetic model were obtained in an isothermal fixed bed reactor over a wide range of operating temperatures and space time of 0.160 to 0.801 g-cat.h/mole of methanol feed. A reaction mechanism comprising seven lumps was utilized to analyze the kinetic behavior of this catalyst. Based on the mathematical kinetic model for the fixed bed reactor, the kinetic parameters were determined by numerical optimization using a hybrid of genetic algorithm and active set gradient method. The developed kinetic model reasonably predicts the experimental data obtained for the reaction conditions considered. It has been found that increasing space time is favorable to light olefins yield, while a maximum water free basis olefin yield of about 82weight % was obtained at a temperature of 630 °C for a space time of 0.801 g-cat.h/mole of methanol feed.
[References]
  1. Standl S, Tonigold M, Hinrichsen O, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 56, 13096, 2017
  2. Sedighi M, Bahrami H, Towfighi J, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 20(5), 3108, 2014
  3. Keil FJ, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 29, 49, 1999
  4. Sedighi M, Ghasemi M, Sadeqzadeh M, Hadi M, Powder Technol., 291, 131, 2016
  5. Alvaro-Munoz T, Marquez-Alvarez C, Sastre E, Topics Catal., 59, 278, 2016
  6. Gayubo AG, Aguayo AT, del Campo AES, Tarrio AM, Bilbao J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 39(2), 292, 2000
  7. Bos AN, Tromp PJ, Akse HN, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34(11), 3808, 1995
  8. Najafabadi AT, Fatemi S, Sohrabi M, Salmasi M, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 18(1), 29, 2012
  9. Alwahabi SM, Froment GF, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(17), 5098, 2004
  10. Abraha MG, Ph. D. Dissertation, Texax A&M University (2001).
  11. Chen D, Grlnvold A, Moljord K, Holmen A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 46(12), 4116, 2007
  12. Rostami RB, Lemraski AS, Ghavipour M, Behbahani RM, Shahraki BH, Hamule T, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 106, 347, 2016
  13. Perez-Uriarte Paula, Ateka Ainara, Aguayo Andres T., Gayubo Ana G., Bilbao Javier, Chem. Eng. J., 302, 801, 2016
  14. Ying L, Yuan XS, Ye M, Cheng YW, Li X, Liu ZM, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 100, 179, 2015
  15. Lee JH, Kang S, Kim Y, Park S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50(8), 4264, 2011
  16. Kotrel S, Knozinger H, Gates B, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 35, 11, 2000
  17. Yoshimura Y, et al., Catalysis Surveys from Japan, 4, 157 (2001).
  18. Aguayo AT, Mier D, Gayubo AG, Gamero M, Bilbao J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(24), 12371, 2010
  19. Kaarsholm M, Rafii B, Joensen F, Cenni R, Chaouki J, Patience GS, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(1), 29, 2010