Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.6, 1170-1178, 2021
Application of 2-methylfuran and 5-methylfurfural for the synthesis of C16 fuel precursor over fibrous silica-supported heteropoly acid-functionalized ionic liquid
Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant renewable and sustainable carbon source with great potential for the synthesis of biofuels. In this study fibrous nano-silica (FNS) supported heteropoly acid-functionalized ionic liquid (FNS-ILHPW) catalyst was synthesized for the cross-condensation reaction of 2-MF and 5-MF to produce C16 fuel precursor. 2-MF and 5-MF were utilized in a stoichiometric ratio. The prepared catalysts were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA). The obtained result from the XRD and FTIR suggests that HPW was present as charge compensating anion (H2PW12O40-) of the IL. NH3-TPD analysis revealed that FNS-ILHPW retains moderate to strong acid sites. FNS-ILHPW shows higher conversion of the reactants and selectivity to C16 (2, 2',2''-methylidenetris[5-methylfuran]) fuel precursor. 95% yield of C16 fuel precursor was obtained over the optimized reaction conditions. The excellent activity can be attributed to the coexistence of HPW, which provides the catalytically active sites, IL groups, which served as anchors of HPW onto the support, and FNS, which improves dispersion of the active sites and accessibility of the reactant molecules through its fibers. The effects of the reaction conditions on the final yield and the carbon balance of the reaction were studied. Furthermore, the catalyst can be effortlessly recovered and reused without appreciable loss of activity. The post reaction characterizations of the spent catalyst show no significant change from the fresh catalyst.
[References]
  1. Alonso DM, Bond JQ, Dumesic JA, Green Chem., 12, 1493, 2010
  2. Isikgor FH, Becer CR, Polym. Chem., 6, 4497, 2015
  3. Corma A, De La Torre O, Renz M, Villandier N, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 50, 2375, 2011
  4. Corma A, De Torre O, Renz M, ChemSusChem, 4, 1574, 2011
  5. Serrano-ruiz JC, Dumesic JA, Green Chem., 11, 1101, 2009
  6. Serrano-ruiz JC, Dumesic JA, Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 83, 2009
  7. Olcay H, Subrahmanyam AV, Xing R, Lajoie J, Dumesic JA, Huber GW, Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 205, 2013
  8. Bond JQ, Upadhye AA, Olcay H, Tompsett GA, Jae J, et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 7, 1500, 2014
  9. Li H, Riisager A, Saravanamurugan S, Pandey A, Sangwan RS, Yang S, Luque R, ACS Catal., 8, 148, 2018
  10. Li G, Li N, Li G, Li L, Wang A, Cong Y, Wang X, Zhang T, ChemSusChem, 5, 1958, 2012
  11. Corma A, De Torre O, Renz M, ChemSusChem, 4, 1574, 2011
  12. Yang W, Sen A, ChemSusChem, 4, 349, 2011
  13. Sadjadi S, Farzaneh V, Shirvani S, Ghashghaee M, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 34(3), 692, 2017
  14. Xiong C, Sun Y, Du J, Chen W, Si Z, Gao H, Tang X, Zeng X, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 35(6), 1312, 2018
  15. Corma A, De Torre O, Renz M, Energy Environ. Sci., 5, 6328, 2012
  16. Bartlewicz O, Dabek I, Szymanska A, Maciejewski H, Catalysts, 10, 1227, 2020
  17. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Deng Y, Green Chem., 13, 2619, 2011
  18. Sidhpuria KB, Daniel-Da-silva AL, Trindade T, Coutinho JAP, Green Chem., 2, 340, 2011
  19. Li H, Saravanamurugan S, Yang S, Riisager A, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 3, 3274, 2015
  20. Polshettiwar V, Cha D, Zhang X, Basset JM, Angew. Chem.-Int. Edit., 49, 9652, 2010
  21. Gebresillase MN, Shavi R, Seo JG, Green Chem., 20, 5133, 2018
  22. Sudhakar P, Pandurangan A, Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy, 8, 22, 2019
  23. Sadeghzadeh SM, RSC Adv., 6, 75973, 2016
  24. Sadeghzadeh SM, Green Chem., 17, 3059, 2015
  25. Kim SS, Tsang YF, Kwon EE, Lin KYA, Lee JC, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36(1), 1, 2019