About The Journal
  Aims and Scope
  Editorial Board
  Submit a Manuscript 
  Subscription Information
  Guidelines for Publication
  Ethics
Articles & Issues
  Search
  Issue
  Online First
  KJChE on
For Authors
  Instructions to Authors
  Ethical Responsibilities of
  Authors in KJChE
  Ethics in Publishing
  Peer Review Process
  Author's Checklist
  Copyright Transfer Form
Contact us
 
 
 
Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.38, No.5, 906-923, 2021
Approximate solution of non-linear dynamic energy model for multiple effect evaporator using fourier series and metaheuristics
Yadav D, Kumar S, Verma OP, Pachauri N, Sharma V
This article presents the approximate solution of non-linear dynamic energy model of multiple effect evaporator (MEE) using Fourier series and metaheuristics. The dynamic model of MEE involves first-order simultaneous ordinary differential equations (SODEs). Prior to solving the dynamic model, the non-linear steady-state model is solved to obtain the optimum steady-state process parameters. These process parameters serve as the initial conditions (constraints) for the SODEs. The SODEs are exemplified as an optimization problem by the weighted residual function to produce their approximate solutions. The optimization task is to find the best estimates of unknown coefficients in the Fourier series expansion using two preeminent metaheuristic approaches: Particle swarm optimization and harmony search. Besides, the influence of the number of approximation terms in Fourier series expansion on the accuracy of the approximate solutions has been investigated. The solution of the dynamic model assists in the investigation of open-loop dynamics of the MEE. Moreover, the acquired results may assist in designing suitable controllers to ensure energy-efficient performance of MEE and to monitor the product quality. The optimization results reveal that both the metaheuristic approaches offer minimum violation of the constraints and, therefore, validate their efficiency in solving such complex non-linear energy models.
Keywords: Multiple Effect Evaporator; Non-linear Steady-state Model; Dynamic Model; Metaheuristics; Particle Swarm Optimization; Harmony Search
[References]
  1. Verma OP, Manik G, Sethi SK, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 100, 90, 2019
  2. Verma OP, Manik G, Mohammed TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 4, 2570, 2017
  3. Bhargava R, Khanam S, Mohanty B, Ray AK, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32(12), 3213, 2008
  4. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, In: Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput., 437, 1011, Springer (2016).
  5. Kaya D, Sarac HI, Energy, 32(8), 1536, 2007
  6. Gautami G, Khanam S, Desalination, 288, 16, 2012
  7. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., 9, 111, 2018
  8. Bhargava R, Khanam S, Mohanty B, Ray AK, Comput. Chem. Eng., 32(10), 2203, 2008
  9. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Energy, 129, 148, 2017
  10. Verma OP, Suryakant, Manik G, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., 8, 63, 2017
  11. Verma DP, Manik G, Suryakant, Jain VK, Jain DK, Wang H, Sustain. Comput. Informatics Syst., 20, 130, 2018
  12. Pati S, Yadav D, Verma OP, Hybridization of Neural Computing with Nature Inspired Algorithms, 1 (2020).
  13. Yadav D, Verma OP, Heliyon, 6, e04349, 2020
  14. Olsson A, Particle swarm optimization: theory, techniques and applications, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., US (2010).
  15. Jaberipour M, Khorram E, Karimi B, Comput. Math. Appl., 62, 566, 2011
  16. Geem ZW, Kim JH, Loganathan GV, Simulation, 76, 60, 2001
  17. Geem ZW, Music-inspired harmony search algorithm, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2009).
  18. Yang XS, Stud. Comput. Intell, 191, 1, 2009
  19. Ingram G, Zhang T, Stud. Comput. Intell, 191, 15, 2009
  20. Verma OP, Manik G, Jain VK, J. Comput. Sci., 25, 238, 2018
  21. Verma OP, Mohammed TH, Mangal S, Manik G, Trans. Inst. Meas. Control., 40, 2278, 2018
  22. Sadollah A, Eskandar H, Yoo DG, Kim JH, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell, 40, 117, 2015
  23. Babaei M, Appl. Soft Comput. J., 13, 3354, 2013
  24. Osman IH, Laporte G, Ann. Oper. Res., 63, 513, 1996
  25. Glover F, Kochenberger G, Handbook of metaheuristics, Springer US (2006).
  26. Yang XS, Engineering optimization an introduction with metaheuristic applications,Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey (2010).
  27. Yang XS, Nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithms second edition, Luniver Press, UK (2010).
  28. Belendez A, Arribas E, Ortuno M, Gallego S, Marquez A, Pascual I, Comput. Math. Appl., 64, 1602, 2012
  29. Lee ZY, Appl. Math. Comput., 179, 779, 2006
  30. Mateescu GD, Romanian J. Econ. Forecasting, 3, 5, 2006
  31. Mastorakis N, Mastorakis NE, WSEAS Trans. on Mathematics 5, 1276 (2006).
  32. Cao H, Kang L, Chen Y, Yu J, Genet. Program. Evolvable Mach., 1, 309, 2000
  33. Karr CL, Wilson E, Appl. Intell, 19, 147, 2003
  34. Reich C, In: Proc. ACM Symp. Appl. Comput., USA, 1, 428 (2000).
  35. Bansal JC, Evolutionary and swarm intelligence algorithms, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2019).
  36. Zhang T, Geem ZW, Swarm Evol. Comput., 48, 31, 2019
  37. Sadollah A, Choi Y, Yoo DG, Kim JH, Appl. Soft Comput. J., 33, 360, 2015
[Cited By]
  1. Lee WM, Park GH, Schroder D, Kwon YC, Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 39(6), 1624, 2022
참고문헌정보(참고문헌, 인용문헌)는 화학공학소재연구정보센터에 의해 제공되고 있습니다.