Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.37, No.12, 2368-2383, 2020
Influence of frictional packing limit on hydrodynamics and performance of gas-solid fluidized beds
The influence of frictional packing limit (FPL) on prediction of hydrodynamics and performance of fluidized bed reactors was studied. Dense gas-solid flows in non-reactive (under isothermal cold and at elevated temperatures) and reactive atmospheres (fluidized bed gasifier) were simulated using Eulerian-Eulerian methodology considering a range of values for FPL. Simulations under cold flow conditions were conducted to establish a range of FPL values that provides physically realistic predictions. It is noticed that bed pressure drop increases with increasing value of FPL when superficial gas velocity (U) is less than or equal to the minimum fluidization velocity. For larger values of U, predicted pressure drop is unaffected by the choice of value of FPL. However, in these cases, the distribution of particles, their velocities and bubbling behavior are significantly affected by FPL. Effect of FPL at elevated temperatures is similar to the one observed at cold flow conditions. It is further noticed that FPL not only affects the predictions on bed hydrodynamics but also has profound influence on reactive flow characteristics such as bed temperature and product gas composition. Sensitivity analysis under cold flow conditions could reveal better predictions when the ratio of FPL to close packing limit is chosen between 0.9 and 0.97.
[References]
  1. Shi SP, Zitney SE, Shahnam M, Syamlal M, Rogers WA, J. Energy Inst., 79, 217, 2006
  2. Hu CS, Luo K, Wang S, Sun LY, Fan JR, Chem. Eng. Sci., 195, 693, 2019
  3. Mehrabadi M, Murphy E, Subramaniam S, Chem. Eng. Sci., 152, 199, 2016
  4. Sahu AK, Raghavan V, Prasad BVSSS, Adv. Powder Technol., 30(12), 3050, 2019
  5. Musser J, Carney J, Theoretical review of the MFIX fluid and two-fluid models, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Morgantown, WV (2020).
  6. Jop P, Forterre Y, Pouliquen O, Nature, 441, 727, 2006
  7. Farzaneh M, Almstedt AE, Johnsson F, Pallares D, Sasic S, Powder Technol., 270, 68, 2015
  8. Schaeffer DG, J. Differential Equations, 66, 19, 1987
  9. Srivastava A, Sundaresan S, Powder Technol., 129(1-3), 72, 2003
  10. Johnson PC, Jackson R, J. Fluid Mech., 176, 67, 1987
  11. Johnson PC, Nott P, Jackson R, J. Fluid Mech., 210, 501, 1990
  12. Armstrong LM, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment School of Engineering Sciences, University of Southampton (2011).
  13. Syamlal M, Rogers W, O'Brien TJ, National technical information service, Springfield, VA, DOE/METC-9411004, NTIS/DE9400087, Vol. 1 (1993).
  14. Tardos GI, Powder Technol., 92(1), 61, 1997
  15. T Makkawi Y, Wright PC, Ocone R, Powder Technol., 163(1-2), 69, 2006
  16. Benyahia S, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 47(22), 8926, 2008
  17. Armstrong LM, Gu S, Luo KH, Chem. Eng. J., 168(2), 848, 2011
  18. Shuyan W, Xiang L, Huilin L, Long Y, Dan S, Yurong H, Yonglong D, Powder Technol., 196(2), 184, 2009
  19. Passalacqua A, Marmo L, Chem. Eng. Sci., 160, 2795, 2009
  20. Hosseini SH, Ahmadi G, Razavi BS, Zhong W, Energy Fuels, 24, 6086, 2010
  21. Rahimi MR, Azizi N, Hosseini SH, Ahmadi G, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(3), 761, 2013
  22. Sahu AK, Raghavan V, Prasad BVSSS, Prog. Comput. Fluid Dy., 17, 180, 2017
  23. Sahu AK, Raghavan V, Prasad BVSSS, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 124, 387, 2018
  24. Lun CKK, Savage SB, Jefferey DJ, Chepurniy N, J. Fluid Mech., 140, 223, 1984
  25. McKeen T, Pugsley T, Powder Technol., 129(1-3), 139, 2003
  26. Kunii D, Levenspiel O, Fluidization engineering, 2nd Ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, U.S.A. (1991).
  27. Escudero D, MSc. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA (2010).
  28. England JA, Thesis MS, Virgina Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA, USA (2011).
  29. Ma JL, Chen XP, Liu DY, Powder Technol., 235, 271, 2013
  30. Botterill JSM, Teoman Y, Yuregir KR, Powder Technol., 31, 101, 1982
  31. Chitester DC, Kornosky RM, Fan LS, Danko JP, Chem. Eng. Sci., 39, 253, 1984
  32. Engelbrecht AD, North BC, Oboirien BO, Everson RC, Neomagus HWPJ, in: Proc. Industrial Fluidization, South Africa (IFSA 2011), 145 (2011).
  33. Lu HL, Gidaspow D, Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(16), 3777, 2003
  34. Syamlal M, Bissett LA, National technical information service, Springfield, DOE/METC-92/4104, DE92 00 1111 (1992).
  35. de Souza-Santos ML, Fuel, 68, 1507, 1989