Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.37, No.11, 1859-1866, 2020
Experimental study of gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flow characteristics in a static mixer with three twisted leaves
Under the conditions of liquid phase inlet Re ranging from 9,836 to 56,206 and gas fraction ? from 4.76% to 66.67%, gas-liquid two-phase bubbly flow was investigated in a static mixer with three twisted leaves (TKSM) with a diameter of 100mm and an aspect ratio of 1.5. A high-speed camera Revealer-2F04M with a resolution of 1,920 X 1,080 pixels was used to capture the evolution of bubble groups at the different axial windows of mixer elements. The results show that the flow pattern in the TKSM is still in bubbly flow at the flow rate of continuous phase QL no more than 1.0 m3/h and gas fraction ? higher up to 54.55%-66.67%. The Sauter mean diameter d32 of bubble groups gradually decreased with the increase of the mixing elements number. With the given liquid flow rate QL≤1.0m3/h, the Sauter mean diameter d32 firstly decreased and then increased with the increase of gas flow rate. The local minimum of d32 was obtained at QG=0.72m3/h and 84.5% of the dB/D0 is in the range of 0.02-0.05. The relationship among Sauter mean diameter, the inner diameter and the non-dimensional residence time τ satisfies the correlation We0.35·d32/D0=0.026τ ·0.17.
[References]
  1. Zhou LX, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 36(2), 100, 2010
  2. Tryggvason G, Dabiri S, Aboulhasanzadeh B, Lu J, Phys. Fluids, 25, 031302, 2013
  3. Mansur EA, Ye MX, Wang YD, Dai YY, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 16(4), 503, 2008
  4. Bertsch A, Heimgartner S, Cousseau P, Renaud P, Lab Chip, 1, 56, 2001
  5. Ghanem A, Lemenand T, Della Valle D, Peerhossaini H, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 92(2), 205, 2014
  6. Bayer T, Himmler K, Chem. Eng. Technol., 28(3), 285, 2005
  7. Thakur RK, Vial CH, Nigam KDP, Nauman EB, Djelveh G, Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 81, 787, 2003
  8. Hobbs DM, Muzzio FJ, Chem. Eng. J., 70(2), 93, 1998
  9. Hobbs DM, Alvarez MM, Muzzio FZ, Fractals, 5, 395, 1997
  10. Hobbs DM, Muzzio FJ, AIChE J., 43(12), 3121, 1997
  11. Hobbs DM, Muzzio FJ, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(18), 3199, 1998
  12. Kumar V, Shirke V, Nigam KDP, Chem. Eng. J., 139(2), 284, 2008
  13. Zidouni F, Krepper E, Rzehak R, Rabha S, Schubert M, Hampel U, Chem. Eng. Sci., 137, 476, 2015
  14. Haddadi MM, Hosseini SH, Rashtchian D, Ahmadi G, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 28(2), 348, 2020
  15. Tajima H, Yamasaki A, Kiyono F, Teng H, AIChE J., 50(4), 871, 2004
  16. Tajima H, Yamasaki A, Kiyono F, Teng H, AIChE J., 52(8), 2991, 2006
  17. Tajima H, Nagaosa R, Yamasaki A, Kiyono F, AIChE J., 56(10), 2706, 2010
  18. Wu JH, Chinese Patent, 200,510,045,606.8 (2007).
  19. Zhang J, Kang TX, Gong B, Wu JH, AAPG Bull., 62, 52, 2011
  20. Meng HB, Wang F, Yu YF, Song MY, Wu JH, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 53(10), 4084, 2014
  21. Liu MY, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(20), 7081, 2012
  22. Song HS, Han SP, Chem. Eng. Sci., 60(21), 5696, 2005
  23. Jaworski Z, Pianko-Oprych P, Marchisio DL, Nienow AW, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 85(A5), 753, 2007
  24. Meng HB, Yu YF, Liu ZQ, Wu JH, J. B. Univ. Chem. Technol., 36, 97, 2009
  25. Yue MX, Xie F, Zhang J, Yuan Q, Zhang L, J. Exp. Flu. Mech., 29, 87, 2015
  26. Cheng LX, Ribatski G, Thome JR, Appl. Mech. Rev., 61, 050802-1 (2008).
  27. Zhang HH, Wang TF, CIESC J., 70, 487, 2019