Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.37, No.11, 1836-1858, 2020
Effect of Biot number on unsteady reaction-diffusion phenomena and analytical solutions of coupled governing equations in porous particles with various shapes
Analytical solutions of transient concentration profile inside particles were calculated by solving rection-diffusion equation in spherical, cylindrical, and slab-type porous particles, assuming first order irreversible reaction. Timedependent concentration in bulk fluid phase was assumed as exponential decay for each particle, and convective boundary conditions were taken using arbitrary Biot number to obtain a general solution by eigenfunction expansion or Laplace transform method. Factors affecting average transient concentration inside particles were studied by adjusting Biot number, reaction time, and Thiele modulus as well as the position inside particles. To predict transient bulk concentration in batch photocatalytic reactor containing porous particles, coupled differential equations were solved by Laplace transform to obtain analytical solutions of bulk concentration as well as average concentration inside porous particles as a function of reaction time. The factors affecting transient concentrations were investigated by adjusting the concentration and porosity of the catalytic particles, morphology of the particles, and Thiele modulus in batch-mode reactor to study reduction speed of reactant concentration during photocatalytic reaction. The solutions from coupled differential equations were useful for the prediction of transient behavior in batch-type photocatalytic reactor and were compared with the results from CSTR containing slab-type photocatalytic particles with various space time.
[References]
  1. Tang CM, Li XL, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(5), 1119, 2013
  2. Murase T, Iritani E, Cho JH, Nakanomori S, Shirato M, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn., 20, 246, 1987
  3. Cao L, Fu Q, Si Y, Ding B, Yu J, Compos. Commun., 10, 25, 2018
  4. Ruckdeschel P, Philipp A, Retsch M, Adv. Funct. Mater., 27(38), 170225, 2017
  5. Lim ST, Kim JH, Lee CY, Koo S, Jerng DW, Wongwises S, Ahn HS, Sci. Rep., 9, 10922, 2019
  6. Hong M, Yu LY, Wang YD, Zhang J, Chen ZW, Dong L, Zan QJ, Li RL, Chem. Eng. J., 359, 363, 2019
  7. Nie YS, Witt PM, Agarwal A, Biegler LT, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(44), 15311, 2013
  8. Erdei L, Arecrachakul N, Vigneswaran S, Sep. Purif. Technol., 62(2), 382, 2008
  9. Xing C, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu J, Zhang T, Tang P, et al., J. Mater. Chem. A, 7, 17053, 2019
  10. Kim DH, Lee J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 29(1), 42, 2012
  11. Cho W, Lee J, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30(3), 580, 2013
  12. Garg M, Manohar P, Kuwait J. Sci., 40, 23, 2013
  13. Versypt AVF, Arendt PD, Pack DW, Braatz RD, Plos One, 10, e01355, 2015
  14. Li P, Xiu GH, Rodrigues AE, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 97(1), 217, 2019
  15. Cho YS, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 57(5), 652, 2019
  16. Cho YS, Shin CH, Han S, Nanoscale Res. Lett., 11, 46, 2016
  17. Cho YS, Roh SH, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 39(1), 33, 2018
  18. Cho YS, Oh IA, Jung NR, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol., 37, 676, 2015
  19. Cho YS, Korean J. Met. Mater., 55(4), 150, 2017
  20. Fogler HS, Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 5th Ed., Pearson Education, Inc. New York (2016).
  21. Pan TS, Zhu BC, Chem. Eng. Sci., 53(5), 933, 1998
  22. Cardoso SSS, Rodrigues AE, AIChE J., 52(11), 3924, 2006
  23. Milozic N, Lubej M, Novak U, Znidarsic-Plazl P, Plazl I, Chem. Biochem. Eng. Q., 28(2), 125, 2014
  24. Munjal G, Dwivedi G, Bhaskarwar N, Int. Proc. Chem. Biol. Environ. Eng., 90, 82, 2015
  25. Li W, Liang R, Hu A, Huang Z, Zhou YN, RSC Adv., 4, 36959, 2014
  26. Rice RG, Do DD, Applied mathematics and modeling for chemical engineers, 1st Ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York (1995).
  27. Saito K, Muso H, Agree to partial differential equation, 1st Ed., Kodansha, Tokyo (2005).
  28. Campbell LK, Na BK, Ko EI, Chem. Mater., 4(6), 1329, 1992