Issue
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering,
Vol.37, No.2, 249-262, 2020
Use of nitrate-nitrogen concentration for controlling source, cellular matter production and oxygen consumption for sewage treatment
Carbon saving, oxygen consumption reduction and cellular matter production reduction of Modified University of Cape Town (MUCT) process under different nitrate-nitrogen concentration in the main anoxic section was studied. This was investigated by material balance analysis, biochemical reaction process and its metrology of ordinary heterotrophic bacteria, denitrifying bacteria, nitrifying bacteria and phosphorus-accumulating bacteria. The flow and distribution of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen in the MUCT, and the influence of the regulation of the c(NO3) on the carbon source, cellular matter production, and oxygen consumption of the process were explained in detail. In the programmable logic controller (PLC) automatic control system, the circulating flow rate of nitrate was set as the controlled variable. Adopting the feedback control structure, c(NO3) was altered at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4.0mgㆍL-1, respectively. In this experimental study, the quality of influent and other operation design parameters remained unchanged. The results showed that the effluent quality was at its best when c(NO3) was controlled at 2.0- 4.0mg/L. Again, the distribution of chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the anaerobic section was between phosphorus- accumulating bacteria, common heterotrophic bacteria and denitrifying bacteria, and the distribution was related to c(NO3). Due to this phenomenon, the distribution of nitrate-nitrogen between denitrifying bacteria and denitrifying phosphorus-accumulating bacteria, and poly-hydroxy alkanoates (PHA) between denitrifying phosphorus-accumulating bacteria and aerobic phosphorus-accumulating bacteria was changed. Carbon source of 110.0 kg acetic acid/103m3 sewage was saved, while the cell material output was reduced by 37.5%, and the oxygen consumption of 51.1 kg O2/ 103m3 sewage was reduced. In the MUCT process, the regulation of c(NO3) enhanced the denitrifying phosphorus uptake performance of the main anoxic section and obtained good carbon source savings, reduction of cellular matter production, and reduction of oxygen consumption.
[References]
  1. Guo JS, Huang TY, Long TR, Tech. Eq. Env. Pollut. Control, 1, 8, 2000
  2. Liu J, Gao TY, J. Tongji Univ., 23, 387, 1995
  3. Mulkerrins D, Dobson ADW, Colleran E, Environ. Int., 30, 249, 2004
  4. Gerber A, Villiers RH, Mostert ES, Riet CJJ, The Phenomenon of Simultaneous Phosphate Uptake and Release and its Importance in Biological Nutrient Removal in: Biogical Phosphate Removal from Wastewaters, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1987).
  5. Comeau Y, Oldham WK, Hall KJ, Dynamics of Carbon Reserves in Biological Dephosphatation of Wastewater, in: Biological Phosphate Removal from Wastewaters, Pergamon Press, Oxford (1987).
  6. Kuba T, Loosdrecht MCMV, Heijnen JJ, Water Res., 30, 1702, 1996
  7. Guerrero J, Guisasola A, Baeza JA, Water Res., 45, 4793, 2011
  8. Zeng W, Li L, Yang YY, Wang XD, Peng YZ, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 48(2), 134, 2011
  9. Yuan QY, Oieszkiewicz J, Desalin. Water Treat., 22, 72, 2010
  10. Kapagiannidis AG, Zafiriadis I, Aivasidis A, New Biotechnol., 227, 2013
  11. He QL, Wang HY, Yang XJ, Zhou J, Ye YP, Chen D, Yang K, Acta Sci. Circum., 36, 134, 2016
  12. Zhang WT, Xue XF, Pang HT, Zhang J, Li D, Peng YZ, CIESC J., 66, 1925, 2015
  13. Ma J, Li L, Yu XJ, Wei XF, Liu JL, Environ. Sci., 36, 597, 2015
  14. Duan JM, Li W, Zhao K, Krampe J, Desalin. Water Treat., 40, 24, 2012
  15. Henze M, Willi G, Takahashi M, Tomonori M, Mark CW, Gerrit RM, Mark CMVL, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 165, 1999
  16. Yu HT. Li M, Acta Microbiol. Sin., 55, 264, 2015
  17. Hua QX, Zhu GC, Yuan J, Lv XW, Res. Environ. Sci., 27, 749, 2014
  18. Yang SC, Wang XZ, Pan Y, Deng D, Liu GB, Zhang GA, Sci. Technol. Rev., 30, 75, 2012
  19. Sui J, Li J, Zhang FG, China Water Wastewater, 30, 111, 2014
  20. Sun Y, Chen Z, Wu GX, Wu QY, Zhang F, Niu ZB, Hu HY, J. Clean Prod., 131, 1, 2016
  21. Yang Y, Ok YS, Kim KH, Kwon EE, Tsang YF, Sci. Total Environ., 596-597, 303, 2017
  22. Sun Y, Zhang F, Hu HY, Water Wastewater Eng., 40, 5167, 2014
  23. Sun YL, Wu GX, Hu HY, Chinese J. Environ. Eng., 7, 2885, 2013
  24. Olsen RL, Chappell RW, Loftis JC, Water Res., 46, 3110, 2012
  25. Zou LX, Li HB, Zheng KK, Wang Y, Wang S, Li J, Water Wastewater Eng., 45, 39, 2019
  26. Xiong L, Bian DJ, Wu J, Ai SS, Zhu Y, Zhong L, Environ. Eng., 35, 36, 2017
  27. Londong J, Water Sci. Technol., 26, 1087, 1992
  28. Hu ZR, Wentzel MC, Ekama GA, Water Res., 36, 4927, 2002
  29. Wang XL, Yuan DD, Bai L, Li ZQ, Yu Y, Qin XD, Zhang XX, Zhao K, Environ. Sci., 37, 3906, 2016
  30. Wang XL, Song TH, Yin BY, Li JW, Li ZQ, Yu Y, Environ. Sci., 36, 2617, 2015
  31. Wang XL, Yin J, Li SK, Wei XD, Gao S, Environ. Sci., 32, 3412, 2011
  32. Wang X, Lu H, Song T, Zhao K, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 36(3), 411, 2019
  33. Wang XL, Song TH, Yu XD, Desalin. Water Treat., 56, 1877, 2015
  34. Wang XL, Li N, Xie T, Zhang F, Dong LP, Yin BY, J. Donghua Univ., 31, 278, 2014
  35. Zhu GB, Peng YZ, Wang SY, Wu SY, Ma B, Chem. Eng. J., 131(1-3), 319, 2007
  36. Soares A, Kampas P, Maillard S, Wood E, Brigg J, Tillotson M, Parsons SA, Cartmell E, J. Hazard. Mater., 175(1-3), 733, 2010
  37. Huang MH, Li YM, Gu GW, Desalination, 262(1-3), 36, 2010
  38. Munchen IG, Braunschweig IK, Design of Single Stage Activated Sludge Wastewater Treatment Plant, GFA Publishing Company, Hennef (2000).
  39. Water Environment Federation, Design of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants, Volume 2: Liquid Treatment Processes, McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York (2010).
  40. Shanghai Municipal Engineering Design Institute (Group) Co., LTD, Code for design of outdoor wastewater engineering, China Planning Press, Beijing (2016).
  41. American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard method for examination of water and wastewater, 22nd Ed., APHA, AWWA, WPCF, Washington (2012).
  42. Brdjanovic D, Loosdrechtt MCMV, Hooijmans CM, Mino T, Alaerts GJ, Heijnen JJ, Water Sci. Technol., 39, 37, 1999
  43. Serafim LS, Lemos PC, Levantesi C, Tandoi V, Santos H, MReis MA, J. Microbiol. Methods, 51, 1, 2002
  44. Comeau Y, Kenneth JH, William KO, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 54, 2325, 1988
  45. Lundin A, Method Enzymol., 305, 346, 2000
  46. Henze M, Harremoes P, Jansen JIC, Arvin E, Wastewater Treatment. Biological and Chemical Processes, 3rd Ed., Springer, Berlin (2002).
  47. Chuang SH, Ouyang CF, Water Res., 34, 2283, 2000
  48. Barker PS, Dold PL, Water Res., 29, 633, 1995
  49. Kuba T, Loosdrechtt MCMV, Water Sci. Technol., 27, 241, 1993
  50. Kuba T, Loosdrechtt MCMV, Water Sci. Technol., 34, 33, 1996